Total Members Voted: 16
Voting closed: June 25, 2015, 08:54:54 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
didn't we just go through this on the front page? wound up with Dekker (yuk)
The interesting pick here is Portis, but we don't need another PF.That's why I don't really like our position, I would rather trade up a bit for #12 and pick Booker or trade down at #20 to pick Anderson.
Quote from: slamtheking on June 19, 2015, 09:01:12 AMdidn't we just go through this on the front page? wound up with Dekker (yuk)Have no idea, I seldom check the front page. I think a lot of posters just come here for the forum…maybe not.
The interesting pick here is Portis, but we don't need another PF.
Quote from: LGC88 on June 19, 2015, 09:15:13 AMThe interesting pick here is Portis, but we don't need another PF.The biggest thing about that is if we feel he can slide over to the 5, and give minutes there too. That would give him a bonus in terms of stock. His measurements look the part. Ht 6-11Wt 246Wingspan 7' 2"Standing Reach 9' 0.5"
Quote from: LGC88 on June 19, 2015, 09:15:13 AMThe interesting pick here is Portis, but we don't need another PF.That's why I don't really like our position, I would rather trade up a bit for #12 and pick Booker or trade down at #20 to pick Anderson.The way I see it he is 6'11 at like 250 pounds, he can defend the center position, and play PF at the other end. Having him on the floor gives tremendous versatility between the 4 and 5.