Author Topic: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?  (Read 3363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2019, 05:14:15 PM »

Offline csfansince60s

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6233
  • Tommy Points: 2237
Yeah, Mook is concerned.

Contract year.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2019, 06:35:41 PM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437
Counter jinx thread
Good job!

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2019, 07:18:03 PM »

Offline bopna

  • NGT
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2367
  • Tommy Points: 136
8  , 6,  8,  8  are Gordon Hayward type numbers when he is off..

If it happens to GH why isn't Mook entitled to slump.

same with rozier and JB...these players have all been inconsistent this year its maddening.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #18 on: January 21, 2019, 07:38:34 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
So anyone still worried about his slump?

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #19 on: January 21, 2019, 08:03:27 PM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
8  , 6,  8,  8  are Gordon Hayward type numbers when he is off..

If it happens to GH why isn't Mook entitled to slump.

same with rozier and JB...these players have all been inconsistent this year its maddening.
Almost as if GH didn't play for a year :o
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #20 on: January 21, 2019, 08:34:53 PM »

Offline Fierce1

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2630
  • Tommy Points: 121
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #21 on: January 21, 2019, 08:38:22 PM »

Offline KGs Knee

  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12749
  • Tommy Points: 1544
So anyone still worried about his slump?

No one should have been in the first place.

Morris contributes in plenty of other ways even when he isn't scoring.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #22 on: January 21, 2019, 09:04:14 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #23 on: January 21, 2019, 09:27:26 PM »

Offline Fierce1

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2630
  • Tommy Points: 121
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

I saw that game.
But it wasn't a close game.
Celts won easily.

From what I've noticed this season, Brown never gets in the game when it's crunch time.
It was only against the Hawks that Brown played in crunch time.
And that was because Smart and Hayward did not play.

Usually it's Hayward or Brown with a good game, but not both at the same time.

Both Hayward and Brown are very good players.
But I think Celts must choose between one of them.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2019, 09:42:00 PM by Fierce1 »

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #24 on: January 22, 2019, 05:01:59 PM »

Offline droopdog7

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6969
  • Tommy Points: 466
I am actually hoping that Mook's recent slump makes way for Brown Tatum, and Hayward to "eat" a little more.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #25 on: January 22, 2019, 05:18:58 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

I saw that game.
But it wasn't a close game.
Celts won easily.

From what I've noticed this season, Brown never gets in the game when it's crunch time.
It was only against the Hawks that Brown played in crunch time.
And that was because Smart and Hayward did not play.

Usually it's Hayward or Brown with a good game, but not both at the same time.

Both Hayward and Brown are very good players.
But I think Celts must choose between one of them.
So first you never saw a game where both Hayward and Brown played well. Then when shown you did, you discount it as not a close game. So, I guess what you meant was you have yet to see a close game where both Brown and Hayward both played well.

Well, they both played well in the second game and that was a close game. My guess is you are going to say that the Cs lost that game so that will be similarly dismissed because you have never seen both play well in a close win.


Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #26 on: January 22, 2019, 11:25:12 PM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

I saw that game.
But it wasn't a close game.
Celts won easily.

From what I've noticed this season, Brown never gets in the game when it's crunch time.
It was only against the Hawks that Brown played in crunch time.
And that was because Smart and Hayward did not play.

Usually it's Hayward or Brown with a good game, but not both at the same time.

Both Hayward and Brown are very good players.
But I think Celts must choose between one of them.
So first you never saw a game where both Hayward and Brown played well. Then when shown you did, you discount it as not a close game. So, I guess what you meant was you have yet to see a close game where both Brown and Hayward both played well.

Well, they both played well in the second game and that was a close game. My guess is you are going to say that the Cs lost that game so that will be similarly dismissed because you have never seen both play well in a close win.

The thing is, when both play well together, it will most likely end up in a blowout, so I don't even know what his point is anymore.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #27 on: January 23, 2019, 12:28:27 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48120
  • Tommy Points: 8794
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

I saw that game.
But it wasn't a close game.
Celts won easily.

From what I've noticed this season, Brown never gets in the game when it's crunch time.
It was only against the Hawks that Brown played in crunch time.
And that was because Smart and Hayward did not play.

Usually it's Hayward or Brown with a good game, but not both at the same time.

Both Hayward and Brown are very good players.
But I think Celts must choose between one of them.
So first you never saw a game where both Hayward and Brown played well. Then when shown you did, you discount it as not a close game. So, I guess what you meant was you have yet to see a close game where both Brown and Hayward both played well.

Well, they both played well in the second game and that was a close game. My guess is you are going to say that the Cs lost that game so that will be similarly dismissed because you have never seen both play well in a close win.

The thing is, when both play well together, it will most likely end up in a blowout, so I don't even know what his point is anymore.
The other thing is since both are essentially bench role players, Brown and Hayward could play great, fulfilling their roles, and yet not have amazing stats. I think they have already had a couple games like that this year.

Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #28 on: January 23, 2019, 03:22:30 AM »

Offline Fierce1

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2630
  • Tommy Points: 121
Morris will be fine.

I'm more worried about Hayward.

I think sooner or later the Celts would have to choose between Hayward and Brown.
Those two can't seem to coexist.

I've never seen a Celtic game where both Hayward and Brown played well.
You must have missed the game against Dallas from 2 weeks ago. Brown and Hayward were the 2 best players on the court that night.

I saw that game.
But it wasn't a close game.
Celts won easily.

From what I've noticed this season, Brown never gets in the game when it's crunch time.
It was only against the Hawks that Brown played in crunch time.
And that was because Smart and Hayward did not play.

Usually it's Hayward or Brown with a good game, but not both at the same time.

Both Hayward and Brown are very good players.
But I think Celts must choose between one of them.
So first you never saw a game where both Hayward and Brown played well. Then when shown you did, you discount it as not a close game. So, I guess what you meant was you have yet to see a close game where both Brown and Hayward both played well.

Well, they both played well in the second game and that was a close game. My guess is you are going to say that the Cs lost that game so that will be similarly dismissed because you have never seen both play well in a close win.

The thing is, when both play well together, it will most likely end up in a blowout, so I don't even know what his point is anymore.
The other thing is since both are essentially bench role players, Brown and Hayward could play great, fulfilling their roles, and yet not have amazing stats. I think they have already had a couple games like that this year.

My issue with Brown is he said he's a starter and he's going to prove he's a starter in Boston.
That happened when he lost his starting job.
There was a yahoo article about that.

Here:

Despite rough start, Celtics’ Jaylen Brown is convinced he’s an NBA starter
https://sports.yahoo.com/despite-rough-start-celtics-jaylen-171738191.html

Hayward on the other hand said he's willing to be a bench player if it helps the Celts win.

If Brown will accept his role as a bench player, I think it will benefit both the Celts and Brown.

But I think the Celts are better off if they choose between Hayward and Brown.
There's just not enough minutes and shots for both of them.

Both Hayward and Brown are starters if they're on another team.
Right now it's just a case of the Celts having too many wing players.


Re: Anyone concerned about Mook's recent slump?
« Reply #29 on: January 23, 2019, 05:17:49 AM »

Offline Androslav

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2983
  • Tommy Points: 528
No, his efficiency was amazing, it had to drop to great at some point.
"The joy of the balling under the rims."