Gotta agree with guava. In KG, Baby, O'Neal and hopefully a healthy Perk we have way more talent down low than Miami would ever be able to counter with this year to worry about wasting Sheed's contract on Al Jefferson, nostalgia or not. I actually think Ben Wallace at the minimum would be a great addition to this team and would give us what we need, defense and rebounding down low.
With Sheed's contract we need to concentrate on landing wings. Cleveland might be open to moving Anthony Carter and Jamario Moon. They would fit in nicely here. Maybe Corey Brewer and one of the TWolves PGs(Sessions or Flynn). Maybe Dunleavy in Indiana. There are a bunch of scenarios where the C's come up with a quality player behind Ray and Paul that will allow those guys to be better players longer into the season and into their careers that just seems to be more important to this team right now than Al Jefferson coming back.
Well said, Nick. I have no interest in the 24-win Alumni Association.
what an absurd argument.
So you have no interest in paul pierce?
Ray Allen?
Pau Gasol?
Reading comprehension isn't your strength, is it?
No, I have no interest in inept players whose ineptitude dragged this franchise down to historic lows. Al Jefferson could not defend me. He is a one-trick pony, and I have NO interest whatsoever in ever seeing him in a Celtics uniform again.
It's a sure sign of the Silly Season on this board when posters begin pining for Al, Delonte West, the sheer stupidity of the proposal on this board to give the intensely limited Ryan Gomes four years at $16 million, etc. Can a "Bring Back Gerald Green" thread be far behind.
You simply said you don't want a player that was on a 24 win team, which i pointed out is simply "absurd" logic. Pierce was on a team that bad. As was Allen. As was Pau Gasol. As have many other players with valuable basketball skill.
I see a Boston team that won a title two years ago, had an injury the following season (I can't honestly say "bad luck" because with players this late in their careers, these things are not "luck" they are "odds catching up with you), then bad a valiant push in a weird and weak year in which all the contenders had serious serious flaws.
I see a boston team whose nucleus is getting older, and with each year has seen their production drop; i see a team whose achilles heal was scoring droughts which finally caught up with them at the worst possible moment.
I see a team whose "big 3" continue to move further and further from the basket, relying more and more on increasingly UN-reliable methods of scoring, with no one to really fill the void of working man's points, bread and butter, high percentage, dependable post scoring. The closest we still have is the KG "don't foul me" baseline fadeway, the Perk Shuffle, or the Davis "Maybe this one won't get blocked."
I'm somewhat amazed that, in a year in which the Eastern Conference got much more talented, people seem to think that an older version of said flawed team can't be improved upon significantly.