With our luck, they probably end up at 10 and then win the lottery.
Call me nuts but, as long as they don't knock us back (e.g., they get #3, we get #1), I'm okay with deferring the pick until next year. As things stand now, If they fell behind Utah, they'd be #13. With 24 games to go and a pretty good spread between them and teams on either side of them (again, we're pretending they fall behind Utah, so we don't care about Portland or Houston, either), that's likely where they'd stay. They're not in terrible shape cap-wise at the end of this season, although they will have to resign Zaza. Bottom line is that next year, they're not going to be too different than this year (even with a potential high-performing rookie). Would we be better off with a #13 in a weaker draft or a #13-15 in a stronger one next year, when we only have one other first-round pick?
My best-case scenario is very similar: Somebody gets a real Jonesing for a player available with whatever the Dallas pick turns out to be (I dunno, Skal or Buddy falls, something along those lines.) and gives up their 2017 unprotected for that pick.
Mike