Is it weird that I have to keep on saying that Drummond and Monroe worked well and Drummond have NO outside game whatsoever?
Actually, they didn't.
http://www.82games.com/1213/1213DET2.HTM
In units with both Monroe and Drummond, the few times they shared the floor, they easily average to a well below 50% win%. Detroit knows they've got two very good prospects, so they're willing to play it out to see if they gel, but to this point, they haven't coexisted on the court together well at all.
Point taken, you win.
Oh, but wait a second. Since we are using numbers (im trying to learn the numbers game
), I got a counter argument.
Another guy at PF and Monroe played for 606.1 minutes. According to the numbers, that guy has terrible outside game (attempted 0.9 shots from 3-9 feet, 0.6 from 10-15, and 2.5 from 16-23 feet shooting 32%. Thank you Hoopdata). So it's safe to assume that he doesnt play outside and clogs the lane for Monroe offensively.
That guy is NOT stretching the floor whatsoever. That said PF also has little to no passing game and court vision unlike Bogut (0.8 APG with a 4.7 AST% compare to Bogut's 2.1 with a 12.5 AST%, according to BBall Reference). He can't put the ball on the floor like Bogut does as well, and yet him and Monroe combined for a +22 when on the floor together and a winning percentage of 50%.
Fit is not a concern with Bogut and Monroe. Bogut can play high PnR's opening up some room for Greg. And Greg also showed, according to the numbers that he can contribute even with a mate who cannot stretch the floor.
(see that, I used numbers compared to just the eye test, thank you IP)