Absolutely. Tanking has been an option all season if the team failed to overachieve again. We don't have much talent... A couple injuries, players losing focus, a lack of execution and we will be a bottom 10 team.
Keep telling yourself that. But please stop telling everyone else that. It's beyond monotonous.
Yes
It was fun first couple of hundred post but after that it really gets old and tiring.
My bad for posting a relevant response to a thread that literally asks if Boston would tank after struggling. The thing is, Tanking has been an option all season if the team failed to overachieve again. We don't have much talent... A couple injuries, players losing focus, a lack of execution and we will be a bottom 10 team.
The thing is, if the team loses focus, has a lack of execution or too many injuries, it will easily be a bottom 10 team. They don't have much talent. If they fail to overachieve, tanking will be an option.
When a team lacks talent, they need to try really hard and overachieve to win games. That means tanking is always an option. You never know when they might get hit with injuries or the players will lose focus. If they don't execute, it wouldn't be hard for them to fall into the bottom 10.
lb, you again avoid the point of the posters and shift the focus to an irrelevant issue. this is a virtual trademark for you.
if GSW were to suffer a few injuries, lack execution, or lose focus i bet they might be a bottom 10 team.
if ANY TEAM were to suffer a few injuries, lack execution, or lose focus i bet they might be a bottom 10 team.
you originally stated the obvious but pointed it directly at the celtics exclusively and thereby diminished the team as if the celtics alone were a team on your imaginary edge. as has been noted by numerous posters numerous times, whether you recognize it or not, your repeated and uneven negativity towards the celtics gets old.
you frequently post very good arguments so a careful self-reflection on this point would make your posts even better. thank you.