He's probably talking about Pierce because the media asked him a question.
But yeah, I agree with your other points... I like how there's a lot of rationalizing from the Lakers part. They're living in denial.
Poor Kobe missing all those "bunnies". He won't make them in the rest of the series either if he doesn't realize what is actually going on.
This is pretty much where I stand.
And honestly, at some point, after completely throwing Lebron off his game for 6 of 7 games, and now doing the exact same thing with Kobe, you would think people would start to realize that maybe, just maybe the Celtic's defense has something to do with their missed shots?
Yes, Kobe missed some open shots, just like Lebron did...but the open shots both of them were taking were generally completely out of rhythm, because they have had to work so hard on most of their shots. An open shot out of rhythm is not a "bunny"...in many cases, it is harder to hit than a challenged shot.
This is the way I see it, and it takes a bit of logic and mathematics to really notice how the Celtics defense affect this players.
First you need to do a study of "open looks" these types of players take regularly against other teams, then you need to study how many of them they actually make. Then you study how many "open looks" these guys get againt the Celtics, and how many they miss.
That right there is the Celtics defense doing its work. People believe just because you have open looks you should make them. It's a fine line, and those 3 or 4 shots you miss extra because of a team's defense make a whole world of difference.
That's why I hate the whole "they defended well 3 or 4 shots" argument, mainly because 3 or 4 shots can be the difference between a 50% shooter, and a 35% or 30% shooter. They mean a big deal, and that's what separates the Celtics from other teams, those extra possessions where they make a team really work and a player miss more just than the usual, regardless if he missed open shots or not.