I'm not mad about it. Rozier looks good and there was widely believed to be a drop-off after pick #10. But, I will say that prior to the 2015 draft I had created a thread here asking if anyone would hypothetically trade the potentially crappy #16 pick for a prospect gamble like Nik Stauskas. I wasn't actually in support of doing it... was just curious from a thought experiment standpoint. The idea was that as bad as Stauskas had been as a rookie, he still might have had more potential than the guy we would end up with at #16. Philly ended up grabbing Stauskas for far less than a #16 pick, but for fun, I keep checking up on him in comparison with the guy we took 16th (Rozier).
2015:
Rozier: 1.8 points, 1.6 rebounds, 0.9 assists, 0.2 steals 27%/22%/80% shooting
Stauskas: 8.5 points, 2.5 rebounds, 1.9 assists, 0.6 steals, 39%/33%/77% shooting.
2016 (so far):
Rozier: 6.5 points, 3.1 rebounds, 1.7 assists, 0.7 steals, 39%/40%/64%
Stauskas: 8.3 points, 2.5 rebounds, 1.1 assists, 0.4 steals, 48%/36%/82%
Completely meaningless hypothetical, but fun to keep an eye on.