Author Topic: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30  (Read 54317 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #270 on: December 31, 2009, 12:14:37 AM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
I know the game has been over for an hour, but Channing Frye is still open for 3.   ::)

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #271 on: December 31, 2009, 12:19:54 AM »

Offline DinTN

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 330
  • Tommy Points: 26
I know the game has been over for an hour, but Channing Frye is still open for 3.   ::)
Didn't get to watch the game - was Eddie supposed to be guarding him, or who? Who's fault was it?
 ???

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #272 on: December 31, 2009, 12:25:36 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
I know the game has been over for an hour, but Channing Frye is still open for 3.   ::)
ROFLTP

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #273 on: December 31, 2009, 01:02:36 AM »

Offline mmbaby

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 881
  • Tommy Points: 53
Our bench 'will be' Baby Davis, Tony, Rasheed and Marquis. The others don't count at this point, and probably never will. Hopefully Saturday will be a game with Baby off the bench, well and ready to help be a leader on this team that showed a great lack of it tonight.

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #274 on: December 31, 2009, 01:05:49 AM »

Offline DinTN

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 330
  • Tommy Points: 26
Our bench 'will be' Baby Davis, Tony, Rasheed and Marquis. The others don't count at this point, and probably never will. Hopefully Saturday will be a game with Baby off the bench, well and ready to help be a leader on this team that showed a great lack of it tonight.
Add Eddie House. Not the greatest but better than "never will".

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #275 on: December 31, 2009, 01:07:38 AM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
I know the game has been over for an hour, but Channing Frye is still open for 3.   ::)

Priceless whit, Racker, LOL ... and it pretty much sums up this game. (TP)
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #276 on: December 31, 2009, 01:21:26 AM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
i will be happy when danny ainge decided to get off his butt and go get a complete bench that can contribute and withstand some injuries...they knew daniels was paper when they got him...they knew giddens/walker are practice players....they knew they didnt have a legit #2 pg...they knew scal is WORTHLESS and they knew williams was a bust. sheed had some promise but just doesnt care and baby broke his hand....they bench still is a weakness because it is oft injured and full of scrubs

You are being ridiculous.

We have 5 guys missing how deep does a team have to be?

well obviously deeper than what we got right now....because if those 5 guys miss an extended amount of time..then it will get rough...and really what do giddens, sheldon, scal and walker add to this team? would rather have 4 guys that actually can be counted on

There isn't a team in the league that could lose 2 starters, and 2 regular rotations guys and not have things get rough. We don't need more depth we need more health. What you want is a perfect bench and their isn't a team in the league that has what you have in mind.

no..i want a complete bench...because 4 or 5 on the bench aren't NBA players..so they can AT least be competitive in a game like this...

With the exception of Hudson/Giddens/Walker our bench players are serviceable. That's what 3rd string players in this league are supposed to be nothing more. You can have 1 or 2 Third stringers playing an increased role with out too much trouble, but when you ask 3 or 4 to have an increased role at the same time your asking for 2 much. Asking role players to do more than they can do is a recipe for disaster. Replacing Hudson/Giddens/Walker with crappy vets wouldn't make much of a difference if any at all.

I think you're counting 4 strings on a 15 man roster!

Re: Celtics (23-7) at Suns (20-12) 12/30
« Reply #277 on: December 31, 2009, 07:50:34 AM »

Offline Cman

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13068
  • Tommy Points: 120
The only question:
Why didnt Walker, Giddens, Hudson play more?
Celtics fan for life.