Author Topic: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22  (Read 29984 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2022, 11:10:54 AM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
Man, I like the Hornets. LaMelo Ball and Gordon Hayward are a lot of fun to watch. Then they got Miles Bridges and Terry Rozier in supporting roles supplying lots of three point shooting (14 3s per game) and good scoring (38ppg).

You look at them and compare those guys in those roles to our Celtics:

(1) Their two stars actually pass the ball and make their teammates better. Both among the best ball-handlers and passers at their positions. Also good shooters.

(2) Genuine scoring and shooting support for their star players. 38ppg from their 3rd and 4th best players. Compare that to Boston - who is it even? Schroder is the 3rd best scorer, then who? Smart? Horford? Josh Richardson? Such a lack of genuine quality offensive support for Tatum and Jaylen.

And they play small!

Miles Bridges a combo forward plays PF. They play two combo guards and a ball-handling SF. They play with speed and skill. Push the ball. Out-skill opponents.

We don't. We don't try to out-skill anyone except for the worst of the worst. We don't play with pace. We don't try to out-run everyone. Everything is so slow and stodgy. Mucky halfcourt offense. Ugly team to watch.

It is only when you watch some of these other teams in the league that you realize how far behind the Celtics are in terms of their roster composition and skill levels.

And yet the Celtics are 2 points per game better, because for all their scoring, the Hornets give up the second-most points in the NBA.  Basketball is played at both ends of the court.  The Celtics have chosen to emphasize defense at the expense of offense, while the Hornets have chosen the opposite extreme.  It does not mean that the Celtics are less skilled or less talented than the Hornets.



No doubt about it, the Celtics have more real and unrealized potential. The J's score points individually, and the C's defend better as a team too. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect in the record. Wouldn't it be great if we could blend the two?

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2022, 11:57:57 AM »

Offline Somebody

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7816
  • Tommy Points: 560
  • STAND FIRM, SAY NO TO VIBE MEN
LET'S GO CELTICS
Jaylen Brown for All-NBA

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2022, 12:12:29 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7234
  • Tommy Points: 986
Man, I like the Hornets. LaMelo Ball and Gordon Hayward are a lot of fun to watch. Then they got Miles Bridges and Terry Rozier in supporting roles supplying lots of three point shooting (14 3s per game) and good scoring (38ppg).

You look at them and compare those guys in those roles to our Celtics:

(1) Their two stars actually pass the ball and make their teammates better. Both among the best ball-handlers and passers at their positions. Also good shooters.

(2) Genuine scoring and shooting support for their star players. 38ppg from their 3rd and 4th best players. Compare that to Boston - who is it even? Schroder is the 3rd best scorer, then who? Smart? Horford? Josh Richardson? Such a lack of genuine quality offensive support for Tatum and Jaylen.

And they play small!

Miles Bridges a combo forward plays PF. They play two combo guards and a ball-handling SF. They play with speed and skill. Push the ball. Out-skill opponents.

We don't. We don't try to out-skill anyone except for the worst of the worst. We don't play with pace. We don't try to out-run everyone. Everything is so slow and stodgy. Mucky halfcourt offense. Ugly team to watch.

It is only when you watch some of these other teams in the league that you realize how far behind the Celtics are in terms of their roster composition and skill levels.

And yet the Celtics are 2 points per game better, because for all their scoring, the Hornets give up the second-most points in the NBA.  Basketball is played at both ends of the court.  The Celtics have chosen to emphasize defense at the expense of offense, while the Hornets have chosen the opposite extreme.  It does not mean that the Celtics are less skilled or less talented than the Hornets.



No doubt about it, the Celtics have more real and unrealized potential. The J's score points individually, and the C's defend better as a team too. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect in the record. Wouldn't it be great if we could blend the two?

I'm looking forward to the Celtics having no worse than a 32-24 record by the trade deadline and starting a climb up in the standings.  We're 10th, but only 5.5 games out of first.  A good month of basketball and our record and standing can look a lot more like the collection of talent that's on the roster.

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2022, 12:19:40 PM »

Offline Somebody

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7816
  • Tommy Points: 560
  • STAND FIRM, SAY NO TO VIBE MEN
Man, I like the Hornets. LaMelo Ball and Gordon Hayward are a lot of fun to watch. Then they got Miles Bridges and Terry Rozier in supporting roles supplying lots of three point shooting (14 3s per game) and good scoring (38ppg).

You look at them and compare those guys in those roles to our Celtics:

(1) Their two stars actually pass the ball and make their teammates better. Both among the best ball-handlers and passers at their positions. Also good shooters.

(2) Genuine scoring and shooting support for their star players. 38ppg from their 3rd and 4th best players. Compare that to Boston - who is it even? Schroder is the 3rd best scorer, then who? Smart? Horford? Josh Richardson? Such a lack of genuine quality offensive support for Tatum and Jaylen.

And they play small!

Miles Bridges a combo forward plays PF. They play two combo guards and a ball-handling SF. They play with speed and skill. Push the ball. Out-skill opponents.

We don't. We don't try to out-skill anyone except for the worst of the worst. We don't play with pace. We don't try to out-run everyone. Everything is so slow and stodgy. Mucky halfcourt offense. Ugly team to watch.

It is only when you watch some of these other teams in the league that you realize how far behind the Celtics are in terms of their roster composition and skill levels.

And yet the Celtics are 2 points per game better, because for all their scoring, the Hornets give up the second-most points in the NBA.  Basketball is played at both ends of the court.  The Celtics have chosen to emphasize defense at the expense of offense, while the Hornets have chosen the opposite extreme.  It does not mean that the Celtics are less skilled or less talented than the Hornets.



No doubt about it, the Celtics have more real and unrealized potential. The J's score points individually, and the C's defend better as a team too. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect in the record. Wouldn't it be great if we could blend the two?
I'm looking forward to the Celtics having no worse than a 32-24 record by the trade deadline and starting a climb up in the standings.  We're 10th, but only 5.5 games out of first.  A good month of basketball and our record and standing can look a lot more like the collection of talent that's on the roster.
I trust in Ime to make that a pipe dream :laugh:
Jaylen Brown for All-NBA

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2022, 02:48:47 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31869
  • Tommy Points: 10047
Man, I like the Hornets. LaMelo Ball and Gordon Hayward are a lot of fun to watch. Then they got Miles Bridges and Terry Rozier in supporting roles supplying lots of three point shooting (14 3s per game) and good scoring (38ppg).

You look at them and compare those guys in those roles to our Celtics:

(1) Their two stars actually pass the ball and make their teammates better. Both among the best ball-handlers and passers at their positions. Also good shooters.

(2) Genuine scoring and shooting support for their star players. 38ppg from their 3rd and 4th best players. Compare that to Boston - who is it even? Schroder is the 3rd best scorer, then who? Smart? Horford? Josh Richardson? Such a lack of genuine quality offensive support for Tatum and Jaylen.

And they play small!

Miles Bridges a combo forward plays PF. They play two combo guards and a ball-handling SF. They play with speed and skill. Push the ball. Out-skill opponents.

We don't. We don't try to out-skill anyone except for the worst of the worst. We don't play with pace. We don't try to out-run everyone. Everything is so slow and stodgy. Mucky halfcourt offense. Ugly team to watch.

It is only when you watch some of these other teams in the league that you realize how far behind the Celtics are in terms of their roster composition and skill levels.

And yet the Celtics are 2 points per game better, because for all their scoring, the Hornets give up the second-most points in the NBA.  Basketball is played at both ends of the court.  The Celtics have chosen to emphasize defense at the expense of offense, while the Hornets have chosen the opposite extreme.  It does not mean that the Celtics are less skilled or less talented than the Hornets.



No doubt about it, the Celtics have more real and unrealized potential. The J's score points individually, and the C's defend better as a team too. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect in the record. Wouldn't it be great if we could blend the two?

I'm looking forward to the Celtics having no worse than a 32-24 record by the trade deadline and starting a climb up in the standings.  We're 10th, but only 5.5 games out of first.  A good month of basketball and our record and standing can look a lot more like the collection of talent that's on the roster.
not to rain on your parade but can't the same be said of every other team ahead of us in the standings?  I'd love to see them climb the standings but their inconsistency this year has killed the optimism I had at the start of the season

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #20 on: January 19, 2022, 03:22:49 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36890
  • Tommy Points: 2969
I’m ready for some basset ball.  :)
« Last Edit: January 19, 2022, 05:35:31 PM by SHAQATTACK »

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #21 on: January 19, 2022, 04:07:36 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7234
  • Tommy Points: 986
Man, I like the Hornets. LaMelo Ball and Gordon Hayward are a lot of fun to watch. Then they got Miles Bridges and Terry Rozier in supporting roles supplying lots of three point shooting (14 3s per game) and good scoring (38ppg).

You look at them and compare those guys in those roles to our Celtics:

(1) Their two stars actually pass the ball and make their teammates better. Both among the best ball-handlers and passers at their positions. Also good shooters.

(2) Genuine scoring and shooting support for their star players. 38ppg from their 3rd and 4th best players. Compare that to Boston - who is it even? Schroder is the 3rd best scorer, then who? Smart? Horford? Josh Richardson? Such a lack of genuine quality offensive support for Tatum and Jaylen.

And they play small!

Miles Bridges a combo forward plays PF. They play two combo guards and a ball-handling SF. They play with speed and skill. Push the ball. Out-skill opponents.

We don't. We don't try to out-skill anyone except for the worst of the worst. We don't play with pace. We don't try to out-run everyone. Everything is so slow and stodgy. Mucky halfcourt offense. Ugly team to watch.

It is only when you watch some of these other teams in the league that you realize how far behind the Celtics are in terms of their roster composition and skill levels.

And yet the Celtics are 2 points per game better, because for all their scoring, the Hornets give up the second-most points in the NBA.  Basketball is played at both ends of the court.  The Celtics have chosen to emphasize defense at the expense of offense, while the Hornets have chosen the opposite extreme.  It does not mean that the Celtics are less skilled or less talented than the Hornets.



No doubt about it, the Celtics have more real and unrealized potential. The J's score points individually, and the C's defend better as a team too. Unfortunately it doesn't reflect in the record. Wouldn't it be great if we could blend the two?

I'm looking forward to the Celtics having no worse than a 32-24 record by the trade deadline and starting a climb up in the standings.  We're 10th, but only 5.5 games out of first.  A good month of basketball and our record and standing can look a lot more like the collection of talent that's on the roster.
not to rain on your parade but can't the same be said of every other team ahead of us in the standings?  I'd love to see them climb the standings but their inconsistency this year has killed the optimism I had at the start of the season

Sure, but they have a lot of winnable games coming up.  Weaker competition, home games against the better teams we do face, only one B2B.  And they're 7-3 in the last 10, which is the best 10 game stretch of the season.  Combined with being pretty much through Covid once Smart returns (presumably Friday), and we're set up to see some more consistent play.

It's a game thread, and I'm going to be optimistic at the start!

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #22 on: January 19, 2022, 05:58:24 PM »

Offline OhioGreen

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 686
  • Tommy Points: 55
Rob Williams out tonite!

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #23 on: January 19, 2022, 06:15:18 PM »

Offline blink

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18154
  • Tommy Points: 1479
let's go Celtics!!!!

get another win tonight

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #24 on: January 19, 2022, 06:20:39 PM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2935
  • Tommy Points: 349
Rob Williams out tonite!

Do we know what the personal reasons are? Sad for RWIII

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #25 on: January 19, 2022, 06:27:14 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11740
  • Tommy Points: 1408
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Rob Williams out tonite!

Do we know what the personal reasons are? Sad for RWIII

His girlfriend just had a baby.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #26 on: January 19, 2022, 06:27:44 PM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7234
  • Tommy Points: 986
Rob Williams out tonite!

Do we know what the personal reasons are? Sad for RWIII

His girlfriend just had a baby.

Yeah, hopefully he’s not sad about it!

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #27 on: January 19, 2022, 06:40:21 PM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2935
  • Tommy Points: 349
Rob Williams out tonite!

Do we know what the personal reasons are? Sad for RWIII

His girlfriend just had a baby.

Yeah, hopefully he’s not sad about it!

I take back the sad! Congrats Rob

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #28 on: January 19, 2022, 07:29:30 PM »

Offline pokeKingCurtis

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3733
  • Tommy Points: 280
In glad I don't watch any of this ESPN pregame crap

Re: Hornets (24-20) at Celtics (23-22) Game #46 1/19/22
« Reply #29 on: January 19, 2022, 07:31:41 PM »

Online Silas

  • 2020 CelticsStrong Draft Guru
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10868
  • Tommy Points: 1807
In glad I don't watch any of this ESPN pregame crap

Crap is right.
I've lived through some terrible things in my life, some of which actually happened.   -  Mark Twain