If you could make Steve Ballmer completely complicit, I honestly believe he would admit, he should have moved the Clippers to Seattle after purchasing it from Donald Sterling.
The Clippers franchise is cursed and continues an underperforming legacy left by Sterling.
I understand the L.A market is more lucrative than Seattle, but it’s more about relevancy. If tomorrow, the NBA expanded and allowed a second Boston franchise, do you think anyone would care about that team?
Ballmer being from Seattle, just for getting the team back, the city would build him a statue. I’m sure he can build a statue of himself in his new Clippers area, it won’t have any meaning.
Let’s not forget, Ballmer was part of a group that attempted to save the Sonics by developing a new stadium. When that failed, he tried to purchase the Sacramento Kings and move them to Seattle.
Even the fact that Ballmer kept the Clippers name, leaves a sour taste in my mouth. When you think ‘Clippers’ you think an illegally moved franchise from San Diego, with a meaningless name, and terrible logo. Clippers evokes memories of racism, cheapness and misery.
Who knows, if Ballmer had brought back the Sonics to Seattle... would Durant have returned instead of signing for Golden State? Think of all the great players and coaches from that region that would want to be part of the Sonics.