Tyler Honeycutt sounds very interesting
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Tyler-Honeycutt-5247/
Showing excellent size for a small forward at 6-8, to go along with a nice wingspan and better athleticism than you might expect on first glance, Honeycutt is a very smooth, very versatile wing player with a big upside and an outstanding feel for the game.
Defensively, Honeycutt has outstanding potential with his terrific size, length, smarts and anticipation skills, and he's already one of the more productive players in the NCAA on this end in terms of the amount of rebounds (9.6), steals (2.2) and blocks [1.8] he puts up on a per-40 minute basis. Honeycutt moves his feet well on the perimeter and does a very good job of using his length to contest shots
The fact that Honeycutt is already such a good rebounder despite lacking a significant amount of strength and spending heavy minutes at the small forward (as well as the power forward) position is a great sign. He has an excellent feel for tracking down loose balls and doesn't seem to lack much in the ways of toughness or hustle the way some other skinny players do.
I think he would be my first choice pick.
I don't watch enough college hoops to know these guys very well, but why would you go after a small forward? That's the last position I'd draft, all things being equal.
Center, it would obviously have to be a project but our issues there are obvious.
PF, KG's only under contract one more season, COULD be used in a trade if they decide to totally rebuild, and BBD has got to be shown the door.
SG: Ray also could be traded, he's playing well but the oldest and only under contract one more season.
PG: Rondo's on a team-friendly deal, but also has by far the most trade value if you wanted to make a major deal for someone like Dwight.
Small forward... Pierce isn't being traded, he's under contract for several more seasons, and he's still playing at a very high level. Plus, they well might re-sign Jeff Green. Where's a small forward going to fit in, even if they do decide to rebuild?
I know you want to take the best player available... to a certain extent. It doesn't make sense to me to draft a small forward when there are needs at at least three of the five spots. Why draft a player who stands little chance of being able to crack the rotation, just because of guy in front of him?