Jackson has grown on me. I used to think he was premium Matt Barnes, but now I think he is more.
What it comes down to for me is: Is he good enough of a player to pick early even if he never develops a consistent outside shot?
My answer: Yes. He is. His passing, driving, finishing, defense, and rebounding are all pretty impressive. The intangibles continue to be heralded as well.
His shot has been coming along lately, but I seriously wonder if, with that form, he will ever be consistent. More likely that he will be just good enough to make defenders respect him, with occasional hot games thrown in.
I'm a little concerned about three things: 1) What was the deal with that vandalism thing? Does he have questionable maturity/character? 2) Every year there is a guy with great intangibles who gets taken too early and becomes a role player instead of a star. Is he that guy? 3) Ball and Fultz are both elite prospect. It's ballsy to take him over them.