Ray, PP, and BBD were ALL killing us. Just because PP hit those three shots doesn't erase a night of horrid play, getting lit up by Pietrus once again. He clanks two free throws as he often does when it is crunch time. He gets just as much if not more blame because Ray played great defense all night at least and wasn't given almost any room to shoot. PP is creating his own and missing them.
Poor performance though by 3 of our 5 starters. What did we expect?!
Help me understand something. Here's two box scores
Player #1- 8-19fg 1-3ft 16reb 6as 5to 19pts
Player #2- 6-14fg 5-8ft 9reb 5as 3to 17pts
Ok. Now lets just say player #1 was left wide open all night long while player #2 was double teamed every time he touched the ball.
Yet somehow, player #1 played great and Player #2 just killed us?
I really have a hard time understanding exactly what some of you are thinking when it comes to player evaluation.
BTW EJ, Pierce guarded Turkgulo when he was on the floor (38 min) and Turkgulo shot 3 for 13.
Yes there were a few possessions Pierce had Pietrus, but not the majority. Ray guarded him just as much if not more since Reddick was mostly benched. When we had a small line up even Eddie had him at times.
Still, even if you were going to blame Pierce for all of Pietrus's offense, 4 of 8 isn't exactly lighting anybody up.