again, like you said, all players have flaws. the debate is whether those flaws mean that he is not NBA ready or able to contribute at the NBA level, not whether or not people disagree with what the flaws are...
I find extremely difficult to believe any reasonable observer would simultaneously agree with the flaws I've described on Giddens game and that he's ready to play in the NBA.
A wing player who can't dribble or shoot, has bad-decision making skills and is a willing but flawed defender? Which current NBA player with a similar skill-level and quality to Giddens is actually able to contribute at the NBA level? I mean there are always guys like DeMarcus Nelson and similar scrubs. Giddens is at their level.
but this is the problem with the debate, right?
you think that the debate is a "settled", whereas others disagree...
as we know, BFB scouts players and just a couple of pages ago asserted that while he agrees there are deficiencies in JRs game, he thinks he could contribute in a positive way at the NBA level. I tend to agree.
not saying for sure that he is right, but it's certainly not a settled topic.
JR can score, he's really good in transition, rebounds, has some nice defensive skills and is super athletic. It's certainly possible that with solid playing time this year he could have demonstrated the ability to play at this level.
I think Anthony Randolph is a good example of a raw player that, when given PT, showed the ability to contribute at the NBA level...
Contribute like Courtney Lee, Bill Walker or DeMarcus Nelson?
Courtney Lee did not contribute as much earlier in the season until Mickael Pietrus who was the starting guard got injured and when Lee first begun starting he was a disaster area. His mental approach, confidence and overall game grew as a result of more time and experience. Not to mention there are no HOF swingment to battle for minutes in Orlando.
Mbah a Moute gets burn on a bad Milwaukee team. He's a decent player who while showing he was likely going to be the best wing defender on that Milwaukee team that was more of an indictment of Milwaukee's roster than real praise for a 2nd rnd pick.
As for Bill Walker, I'm not sure how you cite what he's done thus far as a "contribution". Walker outside of a few highlight-reel dunks has been galactically bad. Missing rotations, turning the ball over, and fouling seemingly at a rate that makes Mikki Moore look good. But again, with experience I think Walker can prove to be a fine player.
Giddens really isn't any different. It's true that not every player benefits from simply being thrown out on the court but JR has enough strengths in his game to make you believe that He could handle small spurts of solid play and eventually become much like BBD has, a player that has earned consistent minutes and produce. In fact playing with the starters has completely sped up the learning curve for Baby.
After next year House could be gone, TA will likely be gone(if not sooner) and Ray Allen might not be resigned or if so possibly to a backup role. Giddens is DEFINITELY gonna get his chance to show that he belongs here before then. IMO there's no way this kid doesn't make it. He has too much going in his favor