I also suspect that they offered Posey a 3-year non-Bird contract (total of $12 million), which is now upped to a 4-year non-Bird contract ($17 mil). I think the second offer is fair, and I hope he takes it. I think we should do the same with House for 2-3 years, then use the MLE to sign Walker and bring in a veteran big man.
If Ainge is only doing the non-Bird contract bit, I don't understand why. Given the Celtics' position above the luxury tax, has Wyc really OKed them to not only give Posey 4 million a year, but also use the whole midlevel? I find that a little tough to believe. Furthermore, even if Wyc did that, who is actually worth the midlevel out there? You can argue it's a bad idea to pay Posey that much, but I'd argue back that it's probably a worse idea to pay anyone else there that much (restricted FAs excluded, but they'll be matched if we only over the MLE).
And I don't like the idea of splitting the MLE. Given how small NBA teams are compared to other professional sports, quantity is far inferior to quality. If we divided the MLE--in all likelihood--the C's get an 8th and 9th man rather than a quality 6th man. And that's not a good trade-off.
The thing is, we might need a player. If Perk goes down, you really can't expect Powe and Davis to be anything but stop-gap solutions at the C position. I wouldn't be concerned about Wyc's money, and I am sure he realizes that if he doesn't get a legit backup C, the
other $70+ million he's paying in payroll might be wasted.
Likewise, I am not sure if you're able to partially apply the MLE towards contracts. Either way, if we're planning to sign Walker to a 3-year deal, we'll have ~5 million available to play at the free agent market with. It is not enough to net a restricted free agent, but might lure someone like Kurt Thomas away from the Spurs.