Pierce Vs ArtestI want to touch on the Pierce and Artest matchup. People on here are hard on Artest and I understand that. He doesn't bring consistent effort and focus, but like in 2010 he brought to his team for a potential match up with Paul Pierce.
Pierce brings out the best in Artest defensively. They're rivals in his eyes going all the way back to the Indiana and shorts being pulled down days. Artest always gets up for match ups with Paul. He comes to play against and he will in this series.
"He likes to bang you," Pierce said Monday, "grab you, hold you, pull your shorts down. He's going to try anything."
"I matched up with him the last 10, 11 years. He's one of the best defenders I've ever played against," Pierce said of Artest. "He'll try anything just to try to get into his opponent's head. But I think just from playing against him over the years I've become used to the things that he tries to do and I just try to go out there and play my game, not really get into the antics with him."
Now I don't think Artest intimidation and head games do anything against Pierce. But the fact that Pierce has lost a few steps from a quickness and athleticism standpoint means he doesn't have any strengths that take advantage of Artest weaknesses.
Artest is perfect for defending Pierce. He barely leaves his feet anymore which against Pierce is key b/c Paul is a master of the shot fake. Artest is one of the few wing players on the planet Pierce can not overpower. Pierce has trouble with guys as strong on him.
Early in their careers Pierce, an underrated athlete, could still get his points against Artest. He just had to work more. But over the last few years as Pierce has slowed the matchup has gotten more difficult.
Here is the H2H matchup.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=piercpa01&p2=artesro01In looking at Artest Vs Pierce since Ron went to LA in 2010 Pierce gets points in an efficient manner about once every 5 games. Here are Pierce's numbers since 2010 against Artest.
Regular Season
2010 - 13 pts on 14 shots for .286 fg%
2010 - 18 pts on 18 shots for .389 fg%
2011 - 15 pts on 15 shots for .400 fg%
2011 - 32 pts on 18 shots for .600 fg%
2012 - 11 pts on 9 shots for .444 fg%
2012 - 15 pts on 11 shots for .364 fg%
Playoffs (Finals) 2010
Gm 1 - 24 pts on 13 shots for .462 fg%
Gm 2 - 10 pts on 11 shots for .182 fg%
Gm 3 - 15 pts on 12 shots for .417 fg%
Gm 4 - 19 pts on 12 shots for .583 fg%
Gm 5 - 27 pts on 21 shots for .571 fg%
Gm 6 - 13 pts on 14 shots for .429 fg%
Gm 7 - 18 pts on 15 shots for .333 fg%
In game 1 we were getting blown out and a lot of Pierce's points were from the line when the game was out of reach. He was 12 of 13 from the line.
Point is, is that Artest has shown consistently he can hold Pierce to around 40% shooting and under 20 ppg. If Artest does that then I think we can win this series. If Pierce is shooting 50% and averaging 26 ppg then I don't think we can.