So many statements in this thread that are so clearly wrong:
the defense? if we could rebound the lack of defense might not be noticeable.
The Celtics are 6th in the league in defensive rebounds per game and defensive rebound %. They aren't a great overall rebounding team because the defensive philosophy is to get back on defense to prevent fast breaks than crash the offensive boards. Therefore, bad offensive rebounding stats and mediocre total rebounding stats.
trade rozier for a pass-first veteran point guard.
I'd like to see a true pass first pg. I have no one in mind, but it would be nice to see someone who knows how to run an offense and set guys up. I know that's not really Stevens' system, but for a few minutes here and there during a game might gets guys going.
As knuckleballer says, a pass first PG isn't the Stevens system so wanting one makes zero sense. The Stevens system has worked with both IT and Kyrie playing the point. Neither a pass first PG. With great ball movers like Horford, Hayward and Smart and Kyrie's decent passing skills, that's all that's needed for this system to work.
One of our problems is inside the paint. Can we please get a center that can make offensive players think twice about attacking? A center that can defend the rim. Not an undersized, aging, power forward or a grounded, unathletic, career backup center.
The Celtics are 6th in the league at allowing the fewest points in the paint. They are 8th in the league at limiting second chance points. The C's are 7th in the league in limiting fast break points. The problem is not defense in the paint.
I will keep saying it. Sit Kyrie for 10 games and watch how different the team and games look.
...just sayin.🤷🏾♂️
You mean when we get worse because we are not a better team when Kyrie is out of a game and Rozier is the starter. No way.