Not knowing all of the facts, I still support Ime. If all this was was poor judgment, I think we can show him some grace.
When I first heard this report, I thought, "a one year suspension for a personal matter that was consensual" ?
Why is there any punishment at all ? I get the part about the potential for problems when it involves a top person in an organization being involved with a subordinate. Still, seemed way out of line.
So I mostly agree with Roy, UNLESS ...........
Ime's behavior was carried out over a long period and he was warned about continuing several times, or
There were repeated, unwanted efforts by Ime to continue the relationship against the woman's wishes, or
Ime was involved with more than one woman within the organization and it became a repeated distraction.
If Udoka continued chronic, problematic behavior (fox in the henhouse behavior) over most of the season and was asked to stop but continued, then he did act selfishly and put his personal desires in front of team success and he should be gone.