Author Topic: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6  (Read 78992 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #345 on: January 06, 2012, 09:47:50 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
The Pacers are legit, and the Celtics are who we thought they were. Ho hum.  This looks like a team we could face in the 1st round (and get beaten by) in a 4-5 matchup.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #346 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:11 PM »

Offline barefacedmonk

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Tommy Points: 1796
  • The Dude Abides
Pierce has been really off tonight.
"An ounce of practice is worth more than tons of preaching." - M.K. Gandhi


Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #347 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:19 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Wow.  The Pacers look like the veteran team closing out at home.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #348 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:22 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11449
  • Tommy Points: 5350
  • Thumper of the BASS!
nail in the coffin

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #349 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:24 PM »

Offline RayAllen4Three

  • Sam Hauser
  • Posts: 164
  • Tommy Points: 18
Just ****ing stupid. This is a far cry from the fun team to watch in 2008 and 2010. Win or lose.

2010 was not a "fun" team to watch by any measure. Revisionist history at its best right here.
KEEP. PLAYING. DEFENSE.

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #350 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:50 PM »

Offline GrandTheftRondo

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1952
  • Tommy Points: 167
....are we really this bad now? Seriously?

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #351 on: January 06, 2012, 09:48:53 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
The defense disgusts me more than anything.

At least I know when and when I can't watch this team. If the other team has a winning record, probably shouldn't watch.

If they are a bad team, the Celtics will put on a show.

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #352 on: January 06, 2012, 09:49:05 PM »

Offline SF Celtic

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 38
  • Tommy Points: 9
This game and all the others we've seen like it, should be a clear reminder why Rondo should never be included in an MVP conversation, much less, best PG in the NBA.

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #353 on: January 06, 2012, 09:49:15 PM »

Offline snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5866
  • Tommy Points: 454
wilcox and johnson should be out there
I wonder if Wilcox could have given the Celtics more on the boards than they got from the other bigs. Probably the second best rebounder on the team after KG.

I'd say best, given how limited KG has been on the boards this year.
2016 CelticsBlog Draft: Chicago Bulls

Head Coach: Fred Hoiberg

Starters: Rubio, Danny Green, Durant, Markieff Morris, Capela
Bench: Sessions, Shumpert, G. Green, T. Booker, Frye
Deep Bench: CJ Watson, H. Thompson, P. Zipser, Papagiannis, Mejri

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #354 on: January 06, 2012, 09:49:28 PM »

Offline bruinsandceltics

  • NGT
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2691
  • Tommy Points: 130
  • ANYTHING is posssiiibbbbllee
Just ****ing stupid. This is a far cry from the fun team to watch in 2008 and 2010. Win or lose.

2010 was not a "fun" team to watch by any measure. Revisionist history at its best right here.

Speak for yourself. I had a ton of fun watching them play, even in losses.

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #355 on: January 06, 2012, 09:49:52 PM »

Offline BASS_THUMPER

  • Scal's #1 Fan
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11449
  • Tommy Points: 5350
  • Thumper of the BASS!
Pierce has been really off tonight.

capt p on point woulda been a closer game but we cant stop them d wise


Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #356 on: January 06, 2012, 09:50:04 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 47512
  • Tommy Points: 2404
wilcox and johnson should be out there
I wonder if Wilcox could have given the Celtics more on the boards than they got from the other bigs. Probably the second best rebounder on the team after KG.

I'd say best, given how limited KG has been on the boards this year.
Yeah, he could be

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #357 on: January 06, 2012, 09:50:12 PM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
So is it safe to say the Celtics are a bad rebounding team?
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #358 on: January 06, 2012, 09:50:25 PM »

Offline JustAfam

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 44
  • Tommy Points: 8
this game was torture to watch.everyone played bad

Re: Pacers (4-2) at Celtics (4-3) 1/6
« Reply #359 on: January 06, 2012, 09:50:27 PM »

Offline Rondo_is_better

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2821
  • Tommy Points: 495
  • R.I.P. Nate Dogg
...So we're just gonna ignore the ref's role in this?

70% awful play and rebounding from C's
30% heinously imbalanced officiating
Grab a few boards, keep the TO's under 14, close out on shooters and we'll win.