On the not-signing-the-charity-balls issue, I'll take a contrarian view and maybe that's not as bad as it sounds.
Let's be real, when companies do things like that, it's often less about doing things for charity and more about grandstanding.
Those signed balls might be featured at some fancy gala's raffle events to raise money for charity, but the gala event costs $50k and raffle/donations only bring in $10k. Maybe Wyc's niece is now head of Shamrock Foundation with a very generous salary, etc. Not trying to disparage the Shamrock Foundation here, I know nothing about them, but a lot of charities are wasteful with high executive salaries and little actual charity. Maybe Kyrie thinks they're one of them, or maybe flat earth conspiracy theorist Kyrie read one of the many
articles or watched one of the many
documentaries that reveal the "dark side" of charitable organizations, and is now skeptical of all charities.
Maybe Kyrie is sick of seeing those balls end up on eBay.
All this to say, these things get framed like "Kyrie didn't do this for charity" when in reality it's more like "Kyrie didn't do his employer a favor" or "Kyrie's not letting someone profit off of his name," etc. I don't do everything you ask just because you say it's for charity. What does the word government mean to you?