Have been away for the weekend...Actually, I wasn't trying to audition for a GM position. But to answer the insult, I actually believe that my post very, very clearly illustrates exactly why I would in fact be a great GM, IMHO ( even if like for all of us, it is a fantasy GM role ).
Perhaps I should have made my post more clear, but I assume some things to just be so obvious that they don't really need defining, starting with:
1. I didn't think it necessary to state how INCREDIBLY HUGE signing a guy like Wallace or someone similar due to their talent, expereince and veteran impact. Having to state it would be like feeling it necessary to state that the sun comes up every day and when it does it's usually in the east.
This being said, while I like the Sheed signing, I wouldn't be looking to usher out Baby too fast because of it, unless we get a good young big back in a sign and trade. We need some young bigs with legs and energy as well the experience a Sheed will bring.
The point I was trying to make was that IF we were NOT ABLE to hit the home run and land the bikini chic( Rasheed), what then? And as a GM I would be more concerned about what my Plan B was if I didn't get Rasheed than what the rest of my Plan A was if I could sign him. You sign Sheed, add a couple more role players, you're good.
If you DON'T get Sheed...you're job becomes much more difficult. However, and back to my original post, I firmly believe that:
1. Our starting Five, if healthy, is far and away the very best in the league. And yes even with the Lakers getting Artest. Perkins is a man-Bynum a Chic, Garnett over Gasol, I will take Pierce over Artest any day, Ray loses on Kobe but we have better team D and Rondo terrorizes all current Laker points with a Healthy Celtic team.
2. BECAUSE our starting five is so good, IF IT WAS THAT WE COULDN'T GET A RASHEED, your next option is to gather as much good, solid role players as you can to keep your starting unit as fresh as possible thoughout the year.
Walton, an older Wedman and a Jerry Sichting wasn't a mind blowing bench in '86. Walton was good, Wedman could shoot some and Sichting played good sometimes. However, they guys were AT LEAST good enough to rest our dominant starting five enough to keep them fresh and we absolutely crushed the league that year.
I feel we are in the same boat right now. So, barring landing the bikini chic ( Rasheed), you do the next best thing, get good vet role playrs at center, wing and point. Whether that is Magloire, Pachulia, Birdman or Parker, Hill or Barnes or Carter, Johnson or Lue is obviously debatable, depending how you view them and how much you'd spend also varies.
I 100% do beleive that if we couldn't get Rasheed but we signed any sort of combo of the following three trios off the bench we will, if healthy, destroy the league with or without Rasheed. Probably get close to 70 wins. We were 62-20 with no bench last year and with no KG for 30 games or so...
Birdman / Barnes / Anthony Carter
Magloire / Childress / Anthony Johnson
Zaza Pachulia / Anthony Parker / Tyrone Lue
We have four impact players on our starting unit....another one off the bench is great but if not...get me proper rest for my four impact players that start with some solid veteran role players, I've got no complaints.
More specifically...
Magloire...yeah, not much left in the tank but...Not asking the guy to be Bill Russell, just asking him to be 10-15 minutes a night of nasty behind Perkins. He's not my ideal choice but he'd work if it's what I could get.
Aaron Gray, same thing, just another big body to hit some people for 10 minutes a night. Much better than Mikki Moore. I'd take him. Again not asking him to be an allstar. Just hammer people and hold the fort down.
Looks like we got sheed, next choice for me would probably be...
Matt Barnes at wing ( like his toughness and utility and lack of injury history )
Any Vet point, though I'd love to see Pruitt make his breakthrough this year. I liike his defense alot at the point.