and again - if you just throw the stat sheet away for a second and just watch him play
for instane the last game against the Celtics - he was just awesome - if his RPM is bad I would strongly doubt the value of that rating
he gave our guys a beating - he was running hard on fast breaks and it all looks like easy for him
and there is just no way that he doesnt have a positive impact to the game with his kinda stats
some ppl just find a worm in every apple - Tolkien has discribed them in his books but he didnt had an idea just how dangerous they really were. Now that they swarm all over the internet we all know
You can't always tell by watching. Last year my eyes told me that Lance Stephenson was a star in the making despite the fact that the advanced stats said that he was average at best. The stats were right.
Yeah. The guy I always use as an example is Sean Williams at BC. That kid looked amazing on the court. Blocking shots all over the place, good rebounder. And then you look at the stats, and see that the defense was worse with Williams on the floor. You look further, and it's because he's solely interested in blocking shots, rather than sealing his man and maintaining smart defensive position.
I will say that straight +/- can be very misleading, especially when used on a game-by-game basis. However, when a guy is consistently putting up negative numbers while teammates are positive, that's the type of thing that is a red flag.
I was initially skeptical of RPM, but if you look at it as a list of the most impactful players, rather than the best, it mostly holds up.