I don't care which of the following options he chooses as long as he chooses one of them.
1. Blow it up by trading Rondo, Bass, Green, etc. and acquiring younger players or draft picks.
or
2. Trade whatever young players and assets it takes to build a real legit contender around Rondo. That of course means multiple moves, but do whatever it takes to get there.
The only I don't want is basically the status quo i.e. where we keep Rondo, Green, Bass, etc. and only add the draft picks and minor free agents. I just don't see the point in that.
Agree completely with this. But from where I stand, option 2 seems less likely to happen than option 1. I don't think our assets are ripe enough to make a big move/s and form a contender.
I think Boston could legitimately do the following (not that I think it would happen, but they are realistic trades) and be a real contender.
Draft day (post pick) trade with Minnesota
Kevin Love, Corey Brewer for 2014 lottery pick, Bogans, Green, Sullinger, 2016 Nets
Free agency trade with New York
Carmelo Anthony (sign/trade) for 2015 Celtics, 2017 Celtics, 2018 Nets, Bradley (sign/trade), Bass, and salary filler as necessary (Anthony, Faverani, Johnson, Babb, Pressey, etc.)
Free agency trade with Houston
Asik for 2015 Clippers (absorb salary into trade exception)
Re-sign Humphries, Bayless
Post Trades lineup
PG - Rondo, Bayless
SG - Brewer, MLE F.A. or rookie at #17 (Kyle Anderson for example)
SF - Anthony, Wallace
PF - Love, Olynyk
C - Asik, Humphries
If that team stays healthy it is a very real contender (i.e. it has a real go to scorer in Melo, a real #2 scorer in Love, a rim protector in Asik, great rebounding from basically all 5 slots, and the defensive/passing PG to set it all up in Rondo), of course Boston has very little left in the way of assets, but I'd be ok with that.