Author Topic: With Ray gone who do we go after ?  (Read 10168 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #45 on: July 06, 2012, 11:01:02 PM »

Offline Trifecta

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 489
  • Tommy Points: 43
  • #18 at any cost.
Another vet min guy I would want is Delonte West. Him and Terry played together in Dallas, so they should have some nice continuity playing together off the bench.

Love Delonte, but he's bound to just get injured again..
KO and Zeller, aka Hopeless and Helpless aka the Twin Towers of Futility.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #46 on: July 06, 2012, 11:03:47 PM »

Offline ChefEricT

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 130
  • Tommy Points: 16
I'd like to see us go after a point guard so Terry can come off the bench as a 2.
Mock Deadline Denver Nuggets
Nurcic/Henson
Patterson/Bennett/Arthur
Ross/Budinger
Miller/Hunter/Foye
Rubio/Ennis/Bayless

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #47 on: July 06, 2012, 11:13:10 PM »

Offline mcshane41

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 136
  • Tommy Points: 14
Gerald Green, Gerald Green, Gerald Green

Come on, you know you want to see him back here. As already stated, Rondo, Bradley, Terry will be just fine for us. Green would be a great flyer, we know he'd be good for a few highlight jams on the break and he actually played quite well for the lowly Nets last year.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #48 on: July 06, 2012, 11:13:22 PM »

Offline Swoopz

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 278
  • Tommy Points: 32
I honestly wouldn't mind having Dooling back. I know he got a lot of flack last season but he's worth it just for that locker room presence in my opinion, especially with all these young guys.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #49 on: July 06, 2012, 11:16:16 PM »

Offline jacksmedulaoblongata

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 121
  • Tommy Points: 10
I say Hinrich, I think he'd be willing to accept what we could offer.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #50 on: July 06, 2012, 11:23:53 PM »

Offline dunisho

  • Oshae Brissett
  • Posts: 50
  • Tommy Points: 5
agent zero...

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #51 on: July 06, 2012, 11:25:50 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28365
  • Tommy Points: 654
  • MASTER OF PANIC
1. Bird right with kristic
2. vet min with dooling
3. vet min with wilcox
4. Bi annual to a shooter (prefer pietrus but he won't take it)

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #52 on: July 06, 2012, 11:29:28 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
BRANDON RUSH
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #53 on: July 06, 2012, 11:30:08 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28365
  • Tommy Points: 654
  • MASTER OF PANIC
BRANDON RUSH

can we 1. afford him 2. is he interested?

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #54 on: July 06, 2012, 11:32:53 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36863
  • Tommy Points: 2968
Another vet min guy I would want is Delonte West. Him and Terry played together in Dallas, so they should have some nice continuity playing together off the bench.

Love Delonte, but he's bound to just get injured again..


True , but when he is healthy he can sure play ball ....he maybe the best we can buy with money we got ....just hope he can play 1/2 year till AB can get back.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #55 on: July 06, 2012, 11:33:29 PM »

Offline delraycelts

  • Maine Celtic
  • Posts: 1
  • Tommy Points: 0
JOSH SMITH

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #56 on: July 06, 2012, 11:40:58 PM »

Offline jdub1660

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1355
  • Tommy Points: 87
Resign Pietrus

Sign Michael Redd for the vet min and offer starting role till Bradley comes back

Redd is what 5or 6 years younger than Ray, and an deadly shooter. Let Rondo use Redd as a 3rd option on offense and see him average 15-18ppg.

In December, let Doc decide the final starting rotation.
Can't stop, Rondo!

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #57 on: July 06, 2012, 11:45:22 PM »

Offline Sketch5

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3224
  • Tommy Points: 280
Gerald Green

Kids grown up since he was here last, he was expected to be the guy.

He's been humbled and is hungry. Could play the 2 and the 3 in a small line up. Only really need him for a couple months, then hes a roll player. Good jumper and crazy athletics.

Scored well in NJ, and don't give me that he played for a bad team crap. He had to score against the same D every one else is, and when your on a bad team, the good player gets singled out.

Playing with KG will make him a PRO.

Rondo will love him.

His D isn't the best, but not the worst, and Ray was thought to be a bad defender, when couldn't the C's teach some one with his athletic skills to be a half way decent defender.

He may be on the cheap end to, that helps a bit.

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #58 on: July 06, 2012, 11:46:25 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • John Havlicek
  • ****************************
  • Posts: 28365
  • Tommy Points: 654
  • MASTER OF PANIC
Gerald Green

Kids grown up since he was here last, he was expected to be the guy.

He's been humbled and is hungry. Could play the 2 and the 3 in a small line up. Only really need him for a couple months, then hes a roll player. Good jumper and crazy athletics.

Scored well in NJ, and don't give me that he played for a bad team crap. He had to score against the same D every one else is, and when your on a bad team, the good player gets singled out.

Playing with KG will make him a PRO.

Rondo will love him.

His D isn't the best, but not the worst, and Ray was thought to be a bad defender, when couldn't the C's teach some one with his athletic skills to be a half way decent defender.

He may be on the cheap end to, that helps a bit.

going to bulls or pacers

Re: With Ray gone who do we go after ?
« Reply #59 on: July 06, 2012, 11:47:26 PM »

Offline Yoki_IsTheName

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11134
  • Tommy Points: 1304
  • I'm a Paul Heyman guy.
BRANDON RUSH

can we 1. afford him 2. is he interested?

That we don't know. But let's look at it again.

Can we afford him? Well if we give the 2 years/12 million that were gonna give Ray then I guess. Of course the Warriora can match but still it's an offer.

Is he interested? I don't know, but we could make a good pitch.
2019 CStrong Historical Draft 2000s OKC Thunder.
PG: Jrue Holiday / Isaiah Thomas / Larry Hughes
SG: Paul George / Aaron McKie / Bradley Beal
SF: Paul Pierce / Tayshaun Prince / Brian Scalabrine
PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Shareef Abdur-Raheem / Ben Simmons
C: Jermaine O'neal / Ben Wallace