I have no issues with AD's personality. He is a team orientated player and a good character.
Is he going to buy in and be all about whatever team he's traded to, though?
Or is it going to be "Prove to me that I should commit" for a season or two?
Is he going to do anything to change the culture? AD strikes me as a guy who is just going to play his game and not really ruffle feathers. Except maybe via his agent.
That's fine, but right now we have a disgruntled team with a dysfunctional culture.
Is AD likely to help that issue? Or is adding another front-facing star who doesn't really want to have the responsibility of setting the culture and the tone going to make it harder for the veterans on the team who are willing to accept that burden (e.g. Smart, Horford etc) to do that?
What stars in today's game do set / change a team's culture?
I think AD is a player that plays very well with everyone & anyone. He plays the game in a good way and would likely play it even better (more effort on D) once alongside more talented teammates (who can score).
Dame, Draymond, Westbrook, Embiid, Conley, Lowry, Gobert ...
The Celts have two very good leader type players in Smart and Horford, but they're far from the best players on the team. As a result it doesn't seem that most of the players on the team this year are looking to them for how they should handle themselves on and off the court. Hence where we are at now.
For better or worse most of the guys on the team seem to look to Kyrie, or else they just look to themselves. Perhaps they look to Kyrie and that leads them to the conclusion that they should focus on building their own personal brand first and worry about their place on the team second, instead of trying to thrive as part of a whole.
I'm just not convinced that if the future is a team built around Kyrie and AD, that things are going to improve in terms of the general atmosphere and culture of the team that we've seen this year. Especially if Smart and/or Horford are traded in order to acquire AD.
Maybe my concerns would be unfounded if the team was Kyrie and AD plus a bunch of vets.
It does seem that for certain teams that have a lot of veterans in place, it doesn't matter if the main stars are not very interested in setting the culture the way KG did when he came here in 08.
Adding Kawhi to Toronto doesn't seem to have messed things up there, even though he's clearly the best player there and has all of the leadership of a premium brand refrigerator. But Toronto has Kyle Lowry as it's second best player and they have a lot of guys who have been there a while. And maybe they just have more team-oriented guys than the Celts do, at the end of the day.
Maybe the answer is just that in the pursuit of piling up talented assets, Ainge neglected to make sure that there enough of the roster was comprised of guys who are focused on the team instead of standing out and getting paid.