Those two additions would be great. But if those guys are waived, the Lakers will be first in line for Oberto.
Why? The Lakers would be the last team I could see going after Oberto. In order to avoid he plays for another contender because he's good getting under Bynum's skin?
The players just have to be waived from their new team b4 the march 1st deadline.
So I think this answers my previous question. You are saying that in order for a player to play for a team, he needs to be signed before March 1st, correct? If so, then Bowen and Oberto will not be able to go back to the Spurs (since we are within 30 days of the March 1st dealine).
No, no, what he's saying is that they merely just need to be released before the March 1st deadline. They can be signed afterwards.
.......................
Anyway;
1 - I don't believe on this trade, at least with the construction announced.
2 - Even if this trade goes down (again, I think the chances are basically non-existent), why would the Nets waive Oberto and Bowen, unless they agree on a compromise of doing so in order to allow them to go back to the Spurs? But even so... mind you that
for a team to take four players for one, it must make room on the roster BEFORE the deal is done. It doesn't matter if they intend to waive a couple of the incoming players after the deal is done in order to get down to the 15 roster limit. So, the Nets have 15 players under contract. Are people seriously arguing they would waive 3 of their current players, then waive Bowen and Oberto, so basically eat 5 salaries, just to have the chance of trading Carter for Mason+Hill? Nah, even if this deal was truth, the Nets would at least keep Bowen and Oberto.