0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I wouldn't just blindly give up the house for Love. You get to a point where you're just ridiculously overpaying for him and that would be my biggest fear here. The good thing I don't feel like Danny has ever been the type to just cave in & sell the farm (even in the KG deal he didn't) and he certainly shouldn't here. Love would be a great addition who i certainly wouldn't mind having around but I don't want it to come at the price of a great deal of the assets they've acquired in the past couple of years. Like I'm not doing both Sully or KO. One or the other is fine.Preferably wouldn't wanna give up more than 3 first rounders here. I'm fine with parting with both of this years and one of the future ones. Clippers or our own pick isn't gonna break it for me.
Quote from: Donoghus on June 18, 2014, 08:11:05 AMI wouldn't just blindly give up the house for Love. You get to a point where you're just ridiculously overpaying for him and that would be my biggest fear here. The good thing I don't feel like Danny has ever been the type to just cave in & sell the farm (even in the KG deal he didn't) and he certainly shouldn't here. Love would be a great addition who i certainly wouldn't mind having around but I don't want it to come at the price of a great deal of the assets they've acquired in the past couple of years. Like I'm not doing both Sully or KO. One or the other is fine.Preferably wouldn't wanna give up more than 3 first rounders here. I'm fine with parting with both of this years and one of the future ones. Clippers or our own pick isn't gonna break it for me. It's not like these assets are that great and with these assets, you're probably not going to get a better return than Kevin Love.I think the term asset has become a bit overused and overstated.
Quote from: gpap on June 18, 2014, 08:14:06 AMQuote from: Donoghus on June 18, 2014, 08:11:05 AMI wouldn't just blindly give up the house for Love. You get to a point where you're just ridiculously overpaying for him and that would be my biggest fear here. The good thing I don't feel like Danny has ever been the type to just cave in & sell the farm (even in the KG deal he didn't) and he certainly shouldn't here. Love would be a great addition who i certainly wouldn't mind having around but I don't want it to come at the price of a great deal of the assets they've acquired in the past couple of years. Like I'm not doing both Sully or KO. One or the other is fine.Preferably wouldn't wanna give up more than 3 first rounders here. I'm fine with parting with both of this years and one of the future ones. Clippers or our own pick isn't gonna break it for me. It's not like these assets are that great and with these assets, you're probably not going to get a better return than Kevin Love.I think the term asset has become a bit overused and overstated.Oh, there is certainly an unknown here with the draft picks but I also think giving up 4 or 5 1st rounders will be an overpay here. Why pay it if you don't have to? You hold onto them and use them down the road either actually using it in the draft or as part of another trade package down the road to help the team. That's an asset. It's not necessary going to be utilized as a draft pick and they could very well need to do another trade down the road anyways to get this team over the top.
If danny overpays for melo part2 we will be paying for it in the long run. Neither love or trying to keep rondo is worth over paying.Trying to keep someone like a kg would be a diff story
Quote from: Donoghus on June 18, 2014, 08:11:05 AMI wouldn't just blindly give up the house for Love. You get to a point where you're just ridiculously overpaying for him and that would be my biggest fear here. The good thing I don't feel like Danny has ever been the type to just cave in & sell the farm (even in the KG deal he didn't) and he certainly shouldn't here. Love would be a great addition who i certainly wouldn't mind having around but I don't want it to come at the price of a great deal of the assets they've acquired in the past couple of years. Like I'm not doing both Sully or KO. One or the other is fine.Preferably wouldn't wanna give up more than 3 first rounders here. I'm fine with parting with both of this years and one of the future ones. Clippers or our own pick isn't gonna break it for me. The only picks I do not want to see traded are the future Net picks. I also think three picks should be the limit of the traded picks unless the Celtics keep the 17 and trade away the Clippers pick and two of their future picks. Or, the Celtics throw in the possible Philly pick.
Quote from: triboy16f on June 18, 2014, 08:24:51 AMIf danny overpays for melo part2 we will be paying for it in the long run. Neither love or trying to keep rondo is worth over paying.Trying to keep someone like a kg would be a diff storyso, your plan is to just keep drafting in the lottery, hoping one of those picks becomes a HOF player? or only becoming good when you can get a HOF player?