« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2021, 09:02:16 PM »
The Cavs aren't trading Larry Nance unless you make them an offer they can't refuse. They love Nance. He is clearly a guy they want to keep and they believe he can be their PF of the future.
In fact, the Cavs believe they have their long term starting 5 in Sexton, Garland, Okoro, Nance, and Allen. And frankly, they may not be wrong. Those 5 have the makings of being at least a very good team, if not a great one, in a few seasons. Nance is obviously older than the other 4, but still young enough to be around for awhile in his prime.
Great team? How do you define a great team? Is Milwaukee a great team? Philly? Boston?
3 or 4 years down the line, I think they could be a contending team i.e. a great team. I think winning playoff series and not being a true contender is far more likely, but they have a very nice young core built on top 10 draft picks. There is clearly talent there.
That's a very political answer that avoided most of my questions.
a contending team is a great team. That was the heart of your questions and I absolutely answered it. Milwaukee is a contender. Philly might be. Boston is not yet. My position on those things have been all over the forum.
Logged
2023 Historical Draft - Brooklyn Nets - 9th pick
Bigs - Pau, Amar'e, Issel, McGinnis, Roundfield
Wings - Dantley, Bowen, J. Jackson
Guards - Cheeks, Petrovic, Buse, Rip