The frustration leads back to the offseason, leading into the season. Losing GH for a bag of jock straps set this team way back. Now, we've used up most of the TPE on Fournier, although they still have $11M remaining.
I think DA should have just made the trade with Indy in the offseason. We'd probably be better off with Turner and whatever else we got in return.
This remains good fodder for debate. In my mind, our biggest issue is size. When we had Hayward, that was nice, he is a good player, but we really had a surplus of wings and still no decent bigs (unless you believe that Kanter was). Now we have about the same bigs as last season (actually less now that we have traded Theis) but have added Fournier to replace Hayward. So would we be better if we had Turner over Fournier? Very hard to say. I don't consider Turner all that good but that said, he would have likely been an improvement or at a minimum, added depth. (And yes, I know Turner ended up injured but I am considering this in the hypothetical).
We are not good defensively right now, that is pretty clear. Stevens has coached better defense on previous teams, even this core group has played better defense at times, so I don't know what the problem is. Certainly Stevens should be able to coach up the team better but I really don't believe he is the major problem.
On offense, Tatum has to take the next step. In general, he does not react great to double teams. I think this will come.
I still like what I see in this team. Yes, it is frustrating to see them under achieve but I do not see a bad team. I see a good team that is young and needs maybe just one good big.