I think there needs to be a PSA ... I was noticing on reddit that a lot of the fans that want kyrie to walk don’t seem to understand the salary cap.
We aren’t going to have cap space either way. If he walks, we are losing a top 25 player for nothing and have no ability to sign a suitable replacement in free agency. It’s objectively bad unless you truly believe the delusion that removing our lone top 25 player somehow puts us in better position to beat a team like the bucks. In which case, you must have a lot of faith in Terry Rozier.
I assumed this thread was created under the assumption that Kyrie walks. We've got nothing better to discuss until July 1st.
Kemba and Middleton can’t be signed.
The only way Boston could sign kemba:
- kyrie walks
- Rozier walks
- Theis walks
- Morris walks
- horford opts out and leaves
- we use picks to salary dump Hayward
If those things all happen, you can talk about signing kemba or Middleton. Otherwise, recognize that if kyrie leaves we are still over the cap and will not have the ability to sign a suitable replacement via free agency. You’d be losing the teams only allstar for nothing.
Yeah I simply don't understand the Kyrie detractors... Yes, was he a prima donna? Check. Did he take reckless dumb shots, especially that heavily contested stepback fadeaway on Giannis at the left side? Check. Was he on and off with media, and hinting at his displeasure at how the team was, and not stepping up as a leader? Check.
But he's a top 25 player, that hasn't even eclipsed his prime... Also we would have his bird rights, which means we can go over the cap, and re-sign, and trade him later on in the future... There is NO point in letting Kyrie just walk away for nothing...
That being said, I'm just befuddled as to what really happened... I'm sure we will find out more information in the future about why the downfall of our team, and our chemistry fluctuated. But Kyrie wasn't like this last year... This is why I'm so confused. I have to believe the usual suspects were probably Tatum, (his comments saying that he thinks he could be the 'man,' in NOP,) Rozier for his disparaging commentary regarding his 'role.' And finally Morris who said he wasn't happy about his role, and believed he should be starting.
I just don't get it. I really think making ECF last year might've been the worst thing for our young players... Instead of working hard to build on their weaknesses, they took it as, "let me just chuck the most 3's," and hope everything falls into place.
Anyways, getting back on topic, I'm okay with Bradley Beal, but at what cost?
Not giving up Tatum or Brown for him, Beal is a great player, and All-star, but if I'm giving up Tatum or Brown, I'm expecting someone that can momentously change the tide of the game. Is Beal that type of player?