Author Topic: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14  (Read 43892 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #180 on: February 22, 2014, 01:13:58 AM »

Offline Sully7

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 124
  • Tommy Points: 11
Jeff Green 11 straight points to start the game and nothing until the end….what a frustrating player.  The entire team looks confused about who is going to take the shots.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #181 on: February 22, 2014, 01:16:20 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36894
  • Tommy Points: 2969
Bazemore is under rated.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #182 on: February 22, 2014, 01:16:45 AM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
Cheer on Lakers fans. Great win. We just stole one of your ping pong balls.

Yeah, ping pong balls. Since the 1000 different combinations get assigned by the league, might as well hope we donīt accidentally lose out on the first pick by losing too much.

Any loss against the Lakers stinks.
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #183 on: February 22, 2014, 01:17:14 AM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
I do not understand how it is physically possible that Jeff Green can score 21 points but  be minus-17 for the game, while his fellow starters Rondo, Wallace and Bass are plus-4, plus-8 and plus-12 for the game.

It's like when he's playing OK for a few minutes, he generates a wormhole of suckiness that destroys the ability of anyone else around him to play well for the next five minutes.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #184 on: February 22, 2014, 01:17:21 AM »

Offline Sully7

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 124
  • Tommy Points: 11
what this game really meant ..

http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2014/mockdraft

take a spin.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #185 on: February 22, 2014, 01:21:48 AM »

Offline cltc5

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7054
  • Tommy Points: 445
what this game really meant ..

http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2014/mockdraft

take a spin.

We got the #1 pick Joel Embid!!! ;D

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #186 on: February 22, 2014, 01:22:37 AM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
This game, and this season, have proven a few things.

1.  Sully is not a center.

2.  Stevens has been awful at reacting to other teams going on a run.  When you've watched your team lose in the 4th quarter all season long, you can't wait to call a time out until AFTER the other team goes on a 13 to 2 run to tie the game.

3.  This team has awful on-court chemistry.  When things go bad, they fall apart on both ends of the court.

Mike

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #187 on: February 22, 2014, 01:22:49 AM »

Offline Sully7

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 124
  • Tommy Points: 11
If we take an L against the Kings we drop below them to the 4th spot.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #188 on: February 22, 2014, 01:23:22 AM »

Offline sed522002

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2280
  • Tommy Points: 221
what this game really meant ..

http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2014/mockdraft

take a spin.

Yuck...had the Lakers getting Embiid w/ the #1 pick and the C's w/ the #8

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #189 on: February 22, 2014, 01:25:03 AM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 36894
  • Tommy Points: 2969
If we take an L against the Kings we drop below them to the 4th spot.

Kings looking for payback after we spanked em in Boston

Wouldn't be surprised to see them beat us ....


Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #190 on: February 22, 2014, 01:46:34 AM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
If we take an L against the Kings we drop below them to the 4th spot.

If you can dream it, you can do it.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #191 on: February 22, 2014, 01:52:44 AM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
No, CBS was doing some horrible coaching tonight! How u keep going with Sully when it just wasn't his night. Now if ur going to force Sully u have to put Kelly in for Bass b/c as much as people don't like Kelly, our offense flows with him in the game. He was about to put Kelly in with about 3 left but didn't (game was pretty much decided anyway, should have done it earlier). RR and Kelly have good chemistry even though neither are shooting well last 2... when they get more time together it will get even better. We couldn't score to save our lives, I'm no coach but I think I would go with a player who's presence makes the offense much better.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #192 on: February 22, 2014, 01:56:01 AM »

Offline sed522002

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2280
  • Tommy Points: 221
No, CBS was doing some horrible coaching tonight! How u keep going with Sully when it just wasn't his night. Now if ur going to force Sully u have to put Kelly in for Bass b/c as much as people don't like Kelly, our offense flows with him in the game. He was about to put Kelly in with about 3 left but didn't (game was pretty much decided anyway, should have done it earlier). RR and Kelly have good chemistry even though neither are shooting well last 2... when they get more time together it will get even better. We couldn't score to save our lives, I'm no coach but I think I would go with a player who's presence makes the offense much better.

That lineup he had at the beginning of the 4th sucked and he kept them in way too long..they lost the lead for us again.

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #193 on: February 22, 2014, 01:57:09 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
No, CBS was doing some horrible coaching tonight! How u keep going with Sully when it just wasn't his night. Now if ur going to force Sully u have to put Kelly in for Bass b/c as much as people don't like Kelly, our offense flows with him in the game. He was about to put Kelly in with about 3 left but didn't (game was pretty much decided anyway, should have done it earlier). RR and Kelly have good chemistry even though neither are shooting well last 2... when they get more time together it will get even better. We couldn't score to save our lives, I'm no coach but I think I would go with a player who's presence makes the offense much better.

Agree about Olynyk and Rondo's chemistry.  Those two look like they could develop a little something together. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Celtics (19-36) at Lakers ((18-36) Game #56 2/21/14
« Reply #194 on: February 22, 2014, 02:00:39 AM »

Offline sed522002

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2280
  • Tommy Points: 221
No, CBS was doing some horrible coaching tonight! How u keep going with Sully when it just wasn't his night. Now if ur going to force Sully u have to put Kelly in for Bass b/c as much as people don't like Kelly, our offense flows with him in the game. He was about to put Kelly in with about 3 left but didn't (game was pretty much decided anyway, should have done it earlier). RR and Kelly have good chemistry even though neither are shooting well last 2... when they get more time together it will get even better. We couldn't score to save our lives, I'm no coach but I think I would go with a player who's presence makes the offense much better.

Agree about Olynyk and Rondo's chemistry.  Those two look like they could develop a little something together.

their passing is beautiful