ESPN had a rundown today of all 30 teams and their future player options - contracts, free agents, roster makeup, salary caps, etc.
They said this regarding Jayson Tatum's pending contract/free agency:
"The rookie extension of Jayson Tatum: Waiting until 2021 free agency shouldn't matter, because Tatum is projected for a max and the Celtics won't have cap space"
Does this mean the Celts won't have space to sign Tatum to the max and remain under the cap ? I can't imagine it means they cannot sign him to a max at all, given that he is our player and the league allows you to keep your own players regardless of salary cap. Can we sign him and simply be penalized by going into the luxury tax ? Seems to me a bad idea by the league to penalize teams who build their rosters the right way thru the draft and select trades as opposed to Lebron's method of teaming up with already developed superstars.
Also, has there been any indication that Tatum would like to go elsewhere. I know he talked about wishing that Phoenix would have drafted him out of college. Also saw some mention on this board about concern he would have interest in jumping on the Lakers bandwagon. I would lose a lot of respect for him if went that route.
Considering the Celtics targeted him in the draft when there were lots of questions about his ability to adapt to the NBA, I would think he would have some feelings of loyalty for the franchise that wanted him and then developed him to all-star status. Also, I would think any player would relish the opportunity to be the next Celtics superstar to lead them to more titles and end up with his number in the rafters and beloved by the (still) most successful franchise in NBA history. Just not sure what is inside Tatum and whether he appreciates tradition or not. Does it mean anything to him to be a Boston Celtic ?
The part about waiting not mattering because we won't have cap space is just saying that we aren't gonna try to sign someone else with cap space and then use Tatum's Bird rights (if we did have cap space, we would be able to sign someone to a higher salary by doing things in that order). It won't matter, though, so we'll extend him this summer (or, fall, I guess. This year is weird).
There are only a few plausible options with Tatum:
1. We sign him to an extension this fall (for the max)
2. We extend him a max qualifying offer next summer, and he signs that (which would be 5 fully-guaranteed years at the max with the highest allowable raises)
3. We extend the max QO to him next summer, and he then signs an offer sheet with another team (which we have to be 3 years minimum, and we would match it immediately. This seems like the least likely option)
4. We extend the max QO to him next summer, and then negotiate a slightly different contract (5 years at the max with max allowable raises, but some sort of player option built in is the only possibility I could see)
People overstate the Lakers stuff, Paul Pierce was a huge Lakers fan growing up but playing for Boston cured that. I also don't think Kobe would have been impressed by someone jumping ship just to play in the shadow of his legacy when they could have made their own elsewhere.