I take issue with the use of the phrase 'In-Depth,' particularly insofar as his painfully lightweight examples are concerned.
If he'd had the balls to say that the 76ers strategy was disgraceful and wrong, rather than being stupid (his words, not mine), this might be an article worth reading. And he even hedges on "stupid," because he doesn't have the sort of testicular/ovular fortitude to actually take a stand on it.
He's not wrong overall, but he's also not saying anything particularly interesting or revelatory -- unless you're the average Grantland reader, I suppose.