Love Pierce, and of course would love to see him in the Hall, but if he was on any other team I would argue he doesn't have a HOF resume, at least in my book.
No MVPs or DPOY. Never was a top 5 NBA player. No 1st Team All-NBA awards, no top 5 MVP finishes. Never a statistical leader in any major category. This is the kind of stuff I like to see from my HoFers. Also no outstanding college or international honors to help boost the resume.
A lot of All-Star games, but definitely helped playing in the East.
Was he ever considered a Top 10 NBA player for any season? How often was he a top 2 or 3 SF ('02 and '03 on his own, '08 and '09 with KG/Ray maybe, but even in his best years, I don't think his place in the SF hierarchy was clear cut).
Highest awards All-NBA 2nd (1x), FMVP (1x) - just not enough for me. Though he definitely scores some bonus points for some great clutch playoff performances throughout his career. Had a nice long run as a top 25 player, but I just want a higher peak for my HoFers.
Pretty much repeat all this for Bosh too.
Personally I think players like Chris Webber and Ben Wallace or more deserving. Pierce was good longer, but their peaks were longer and higher than Pierce's.
But he has a 99.7% Hall of Fame probability according to bball-reference (and Bosh with 99.5%) so what do I know.
Judged by the standards of those already in the HOF, though, Pierce and Bosh clearly belong. And, both had better careers than Webber (only a 5x All-Star and no Finals appearances).
Oh no doubt, they're getting in, this is just my personal view that I know is the minority.
Do you disagree though that peak Webber was better? I'd take his top 5 seasons (pretty much his Sacto run) over any of Bosh or Pierce's best.
Also there's that whole questionable 2002 series keeping Webber from a Finals appearance.
Personally, and I know I'm in the minority, I think 5 All-NBA awards (1x 1st, 3x 2nd, 1x 3rd) is a greater accomplishment than any number of All-Star games (so more about Bosh with only a sole 2nd team appearance than Pierce with 4 total appearances but three of them being 3rd). Championships are even better sure, but then it gets more complicated trying to divvy out what one contributed when trying to measure individual greatness, but then there's Ben Wallace with multiple Finals appearances + a ring + 4DPOY + 5x All-NBA +5x All-D.
Pierce was a 10 time All-Star and finals MVP. Second in points scored for a franchise. That’s not enough?
I just don't think All-Star selections should be held in such high regard. I think if you put Pierce or Bosh in the Western Conference, they'd each have fewer selections.
All-Star does a decent job of measuring if your somewhere in the top 30ish of the NBA, with a few mercy invitations sprinkled throughout.
All-NBA does a better job of measuring if you're in the top 15 while also providing tiers (1st, 2nd, 3rd) with fewer and less conspicuous mercy invitations.
While All-Star is nice to have, if it's the main driver on your resume, I don't think that should be enough. I think HoF should be more exclusive (but it's not, Pierce and Bosh are definitely getting in).