So you’re just going to give away an All Star just because he said silly things? And I meant to say desperate to find thing to dislike but I was cutoff. I do think it’s odd that people seemingly wants to just let him walk after one bad series.
See, this is an example of the problem with discussions surrounding this topic.
Not once in this thread have I said a single thing about letting Kyrie go, re-signing Kyrie, or whatever.
This is a thread about the All-NBA team.
Yet you've jumped straight to the topic that you're agitated about, apparently. Who cares what the thread is about or what other people have actually said?
My point is that yes, Kyrie absolutely deserves All-NBA if you're looking only at his numbers.
To me, though, he wasn't in the top 6 guards in the league this season in terms of adding value to his team. I believe that because I think that the value a player brings to a team can't be measured accurately if you're only looking at the numbers.
Okay... Name the top 6 guards in this season in terms of adding value not named Steph.
Because there is no way you can argue Westbrook or Kemba should even be up there...
Curry, Harden, Dame, Beal, Klay, Kemba
I agree with you that Westbrook shouldn't have gotten it. Westbrook to me is a guy who does a lot of things on the court but doing a lot of things doesn't necessarily translate to making your team better.
I probably wouldn't argue for Mike Conley or Jrue Holiday, but I wouldn't blame somebody for arguing they ought to be considered on account of leadership & consistency (in Conley's case) or defense (in Holiday's case).