CelticsStrong
Around the League => Transaction Ideas and Rumors => Topic started by: eugen on January 29, 2013, 06:14:17 PM
-
Trade idea: Terry for Billups( if he wil be healthy)? What do you think?
-
They have Jamal and Bledsoe. Don't see why they need Terry's three year deal.
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
-
They have Jamal and Bledsoe. Don't see why they need Terry's three year deal.
this....would be a great steal for us but yeah right
-
If Cs get Billups, we can have a great starting 5
Billups
Green
PP
Sully
KG
-
Chris Paul loves Chauncey, so I doubt LA does this.
Bledsoe is their most expendable guard. The asking price is probably too high, but I'd love to get him.
-
Chris Paul loves Chauncey, so I doubt LA does this.
Chauncey might love to be at starting 5 at Cs, instead of being on the bench with Clippers
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
-
Chris Paul loves Chauncey, so I doubt LA does this.
Chauncey might love to be at starting 5 at Cs, instead of being on the bench with Clippers
He's injured right now, did you know that?
He also starts alongside Paul when healthy, did you know that, too?
-
LA has no need for any trades whatsoever, unless it's Bledsoe, but with Paul being injured more often, they might want to keep him around for insurance.
-
LA has no need for any trades whatsoever,
Really?! I did know that you are GM of Clippers...
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
-
There is a chance to built again a BIG3-PP, Billups, KG
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
Celtics say no.
Trading KG and Pierce for only Bledsoe? (the rest is either older and on the way out or overpayed for the next three seasons)
-
The Clippers have Jamal Crawford, what use would they have for Terry?
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
Celtics say no.
Trading KG and Pierce for only Bledsoe? (the rest is either older and on the way out or overpayed for the next three seasons)
I don't agree. If the Cs decide to trade either, i find it hard to believe they're going to get a better haul than this, especially when you narrow the list to teams that KG would actually approve a trade to.
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
Celtics say no.
Trading KG and Pierce for only Bledsoe? (the rest is either older and on the way out or overpayed for the next three seasons)
I don't agree. If the Cs decide to trade either, i find it hard to believe they're going to get a better haul than this, especially when you narrow the list to teams that KG would actually approve a trade to.
A backup G (this is for the Celtics with Rondo and Bradley. There are many places he would be a starter), and overpayed C and older vets.
They would be better off just letting Pierce and KG go off the books when their contracts end.
-
Dont see it happening. Not sure how I would feel about it. Injuries have taken a toll on him the past few years. At least Terry is healthy. (Knock on wood)
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
Celtics say no.
Trading KG and Pierce for only Bledsoe? (the rest is either older and on the way out or overpayed for the next three seasons)
I don't agree. If the Cs decide to trade either, i find it hard to believe they're going to get a better haul than this, especially when you narrow the list to teams that KG would actually approve a trade to.
A backup G (this is for the Celtics with Rondo and Bradley. There are many places he would be a starter), and overpayed C and older vets.
They would be better off just letting Pierce and KG go off the books when their contracts end.
You and have debated this before, so we're just going to have to disagree.
I see Bledsoe as a terrific asset, whether as a building block or a trade piece. Not trading for him because of Rondo is short sighted, IMO.
And I just don't have a problem with Jordan's deal the way you do -- i see him as problematic for the Clips, but a pretty interesting piece for a rebuilding club.
Example: I'd far prefer to pay Jordan his deal than Green his.
-
I can see Terry going to LAC before the deadline. And I can see Billups coming back. But, i think it'd be part of a biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigggggg swap -- not straight up. Drumroll please....
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b4ygshu
Clips get a ring with that one.
Yep. Id say it will be discussed on both sides.
Celtics say no.
Trading KG and Pierce for only Bledsoe? (the rest is either older and on the way out or overpayed for the next three seasons)
I don't agree. If the Cs decide to trade either, i find it hard to believe they're going to get a better haul than this, especially when you narrow the list to teams that KG would actually approve a trade to.
A backup G (this is for the Celtics with Rondo and Bradley. There are many places he would be a starter), and overpayed C and older vets.
They would be better off just letting Pierce and KG go off the books when their contracts end.
You and have debated this before, so we're just going to have to disagree.
I see Bledsoe as a terrific asset, whether as a building block or a trade piece. Not trading for him because of Rondo is short sighted, IMO.
And I just don't have a problem with Jordan's deal the way you do -- i see him as problematic for the Clips, but a pretty interesting piece for a rebuilding club.
Example: I'd far prefer to pay Jordan his deal than Green his.
I would prefer Jordan to Green as well because as a C, I think he would be easier to move. But this trade includes Pierce and KG.