Author Topic: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15  (Read 38113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #330 on: December 04, 2015, 02:07:26 AM »

Offline 86MaxwellSmart

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3838
  • Tommy Points: 379
Rondo----I could read his lips....he called Kennedy every anti-gay name in the book-after he got tossed----gonna be fun to see the league suspend and fine him for this-!
Larry Bird was Greater than you think.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #331 on: December 04, 2015, 02:16:02 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
We've won 4 out of 5... can we blame the improved offense on Marcus Smart not being out there?

Avery Bradley is playing like an all-star.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #332 on: December 04, 2015, 02:19:40 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
With Smart:  5-4

Without Smart:  6-4

That settles that.   But seriously, do we have numbers for how our offense/defense is impacted in those small sample sizes?   SMart is a great defender, but he's atrocious offensively.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #333 on: December 04, 2015, 03:03:36 AM »

Offline MJohnnyboy

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2438
  • Tommy Points: 269
Oh honey. Just... hush. Take a deep breath and just enjoy the night, okay? Instead of clearly trying to stir up discussion, think more positive thoughts. Like, for example, because of Denver, the Celtics are now 1/2 game back from the Atlantic division lead.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #334 on: December 04, 2015, 05:41:02 AM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
With Smart:  5-4

Without Smart:  6-4

That settles that.   But seriously, do we have numbers for how our offense/defense is impacted in those small sample sizes?   SMart is a great defender, but he's atrocious offensively.

Even in blowouts wins this is what you need to harp on? Are you sure don't want to revisit your Bradley for McLemore trade ideas?

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #335 on: December 04, 2015, 07:24:45 AM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30922
  • Tommy Points: 3766
  • Yup
So no minutes for DMC in the 4th?  Interesting.
the kings packed it in early tonight. as a team it was a pathetic effort. i dont see how karl can keep his job much longer.

He'll last longer than McHale did after a Celtics emasculation special anyhow.
Yup

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #336 on: December 04, 2015, 07:33:48 AM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
With Smart:  5-4

Without Smart:  6-4

That settles that.   But seriously, do we have numbers for how our offense/defense is impacted in those small sample sizes?   SMart is a great defender, but he's atrocious offensively.

There no doubt the eye test says the offense is better without him and the defense is better with him.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #337 on: December 04, 2015, 07:59:05 AM »

Offline HomerSapien

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 657
  • Tommy Points: 43
I wish Smart had a chance to play against that matador defense last night. Might have actually driven to the cup a few times.

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #338 on: December 04, 2015, 08:08:27 AM »

Offline celts55

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2602
  • Tommy Points: 574
Maybe I missed it, but did they mention why Sully hardly played?
Zeller got some early minutes. Haven't seen that in a while.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2015, 08:24:16 AM by celts55 »

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #339 on: December 04, 2015, 08:35:06 AM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
Rondo----I could read his lips....he called Kennedy every anti-gay name in the book-after he got tossed----gonna be fun to see the league suspend and fine him for this-!

That team is a train wreck, imagine Rondo and DMC as your team leaders? Neither want to play defense, both are ticking time bombs, omg! At least every other time up the court DMC is pushing and shoving people, he looks like the kid in high school that spent 3 days a week internally suspended, does he need meds? ???

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #340 on: December 04, 2015, 08:51:57 AM »

Offline myselfonline

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 110
  • Tommy Points: 12
Maybe I missed it, but did they mention why Sully hardly played?
Zeller got some early minutes. Haven't seen that in a while.

Zeller got some early minutes because as Scal said, Brad Stevens wanted his players to get used to the elevation early on.
The elevation might also be a reason why Sully got less minutes. He probably got winded too fast, although it didn't look like it. But all of the bigs played well, so that was likely the reason for the distributed minutes. 

Re: Celtics (10-8) at Kings (7-12) Game #19 12/3/15
« Reply #341 on: December 04, 2015, 09:00:26 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14491
  • Tommy Points: 977
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
With Smart:  5-4

Without Smart:  6-4

That settles that.   But seriously, do we have numbers for how our offense/defense is impacted in those small sample sizes?   SMart is a great defender, but he's atrocious offensively.

Even in blowouts wins this is what you need to harp on? Are you sure don't want to revisit your Bradley for McLemore trade ideas?
Yeah McLemore was unimpressive.  Really the entire backcourt of the Kings was bad...and nobody on the roster plays defense, team is a mess.