Sorry, ACF, this is one time I don't agee with you. Since we are so careful to keep this site "family friendly", I really don't understand why banning this kind of thing is considered censorship by some people. You can watch it and post it somewhere else. Just my opinion.
I'm not saying I will watch it (I won't) but it's still only a movie. I guess it's not for the squeamish. But Roy posted some stuff about what goes on in the movie and if people feel that they'll be able to stomach such depravity, then let them. It's not going to make the world a worse place than it was in the first place. It's like blaming violent video games for school shootings or heavy metal music for some violent murder spree.
People make choices, you can't blame movies or any other art for those choices.
I'm not big on grauitous depravity. And, I am especially not big on creative depravity -- conjouring up cruelties that may be more imagined than really occurring just to intrigue viewers.
On the other hand, we shouldn't discount the power of realitic depictions of true horrors. As one example, I remember seeing the rape seen in the Jody Foster film, Accused, about a real raping that occurred in New Bedford in 1983. The rape scene completely (in my opinion) dispelled any notion that a woman could, in any way, be culpable for being sexually attacked regardless of how provocative, suggestive, or consensual she might be at any point. It drove home very powerfully the notion that "no" means "no" -- no matter what. I think the scene may have provided rape victims with some measure of relief from undeserved feelings of guilt. And I am sure that it changed the views of some men.
At the time, some found the rape scene too graphic and too long. But, sometimes realistic dramatizations are required in order to achieve the intensity to drive a point home.