0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terrible
Quote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.
Quote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:45:41 PMQuote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.From Keith Smith’s list of guys probably available for the MLE, I’d rank several well ahead of Gallo. I’m not measuring him against all stars.
Quote from: Sophomore on June 30, 2022, 07:47:15 PMQuote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:45:41 PMQuote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.From Keith Smith’s list of guys probably available for the MLE, I’d rank several well ahead of Gallo. I’m not measuring him against all stars.Who’s on that list?
Quote from: Roy H. on June 30, 2022, 07:47:56 PMQuote from: Sophomore on June 30, 2022, 07:47:15 PMQuote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:45:41 PMQuote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.From Keith Smith’s list of guys probably available for the MLE, I’d rank several well ahead of Gallo. I’m not measuring him against all stars.Who’s on that list?https://www.celticsblog.com/2022/6/27/23185843/top-15-boston-celtics-taxpayer-mle-targets
Quote from: Sophomore on June 30, 2022, 07:47:15 PMQuote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:45:41 PMQuote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.From Keith Smith’s list of guys probably available for the MLE, I’d rank several well ahead of Gallo. I’m not measuring him against all stars.His list wasn't that realistic. A big chunk of those guys have already signed for above the TMLE. But he's not an insider, he's a fan who's done a great job of learning capology and spinning it into a career.
Quote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:56:18 PMQuote from: Sophomore on June 30, 2022, 07:47:15 PMQuote from: RJ87 on June 30, 2022, 07:45:41 PMQuote from: ozgod on June 30, 2022, 07:02:33 PMGives us a stretch four rebounding option. Shame his D is terribleIf he could play D, he'd be out of our price range.Whoever we get with the TMLE is gonna be flawed.From Keith Smith’s list of guys probably available for the MLE, I’d rank several well ahead of Gallo. I’m not measuring him against all stars.His list wasn't that realistic. A big chunk of those guys have already signed for above the TMLE. But he's not an insider, he's a fan who's done a great job of learning capology and spinning it into a career.I'd much rather Warren over Gallo. If it's true he's fully healthy he's one that can make this bench much better.
Warren hasn’t played in 2 years and has averaged 41 games over 8 seasons
Looks like Gallo is favoring contract length over role. Will the Cs be willing to give him a 2 year deal like the Bulls are offering?
Quote from: radiohead on June 30, 2022, 07:37:15 PMLooks like Gallo is favoring contract length over role. Will the Cs be willing to give him a 2 year deal like the Bulls are offering?Two years isn't so bad. Could be useful in a trade. Gallo would be a good addition, and nice offense off the bench for the Cs.