Moore has a point.
1. guaranteed he would we playing more in a system like the Spurs.
2. he would be playing over Dooling in almost any other NBA team.
I don't think either of these things are true. In all but one game, he has not looked like an NBA player. He has struggled to get his shot off against any defense, and is not a strong defensive player or PG.
On the Spurs, he wouldn't see the floor either, because they would have about 5 guys in front of him.
As for being better than Dooling...well, I won't get into that argument, since I know I think more of Dooling than most people on this site. But since Dooling isn't in the rotation either right now, it doesn't really matter.
Moore is at best a borderline NBA player.
I completely disagree. I think people forgot Moores game since he hasn't been playing. When he and Bradley were splitting minutes earlier in the season, Moore showed that he DID have the ability to create his own shot. That was one of the things mentioned almost every game thread as a reason to have Moore get more time when our bench lacked scoring.
He is also a far better ball handler than Bradley, and looked more comfortable running the offense than Bradley. With Bradley playing SG now, that's less of an issue, but comparing them as point guards, that's another advantage to Moore.
Moore also showed himself to be a solid defender when given the minutes. He probably averaged as many steals as AB Per minute, when they split time early in the year.
Everyone is all over Bradley now, but earlier in the year when they were splitting their time, Moore was a significantly better player offensively (with actual moves...not just cutting), while also being a tough defender. If I saw a player that I felt superior to getting tons of minutes while I rode the bench, I'd be frustrated as well.