I have a question for everyone though. In years past i have always gone RB usually with my first pick. But if you had say somewhere between 4-12 in the draft why not go with an Aaron Rodgers? He almost always is good for 30 points and RB i feel are estimated to get too many points and they sometimes don't live up to where you draft them. But outside of Peterson,Bell, Charles and Mccoy then why not going for the sure fire points and pair a stud QB with a WR from his team. Reason i say this is last year I had the 2 and 3rd pick in two different drafts went with AP in one and Shady in the other and both cost be dearly.
RB in round 1. Always.
The caveat to this is if you find yourself in the middle of the 1st round, you might have to choose between taking one of the top 2nd tier RBs, or taking one of the very best wide receivers.
Personally, I'd go with a top wide receiver rather than betting on Demarco Murray or LeSean McCoy to duplicate last year's performance with a new team, or a relatively unproven guy taking over a larger role like CJ Anderson or Jeremy Hill.
But you have to think about what kind of player you might be able to get with your second pick. Will there be a quality running back there for you in the teens or low twenties?
Also, how savvy is your league to rookies? I'm usually able to get one or two nice rookie WRs or RBs in the draft because the guys in my league have a bias toward selecting guys who played well the year before.
That worked out really well for me last year with Kelvin Benjamin, for example. Less so with Brandin Cooks.
This year I took flyers on Ameer Abdullah and Devante Parker.