Author Topic: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games  (Read 2600 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« on: October 19, 2017, 11:08:01 AM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6043
  • Tommy Points: 766
It's been a while. I thought I was done posting on Celticsblog, but there are very few Celtic fans where I am from. Here are my thoughts.

1. I believe in Kyrie, but he is not getting us into our offensive sets well. He doesn't allow pick-setters (Al) to get set before he starts moving. This hasn't led to offensive fouls yet, but I think it will. He is trying to be patient working the screen, but he is not putting pressure on the defense. He goes around the pick and dribbles back, inviting the double team, but he does it too slowly, allowing helpside to get to the roll man. At that point, his vision and timing are not advanced enough yet to read the cross court option, leaving him stranded. This happened many times against a lanky defense last night.

Again, I believe in Kyrie. I think sometimes his teammates are not making the right cuts to open spots - so the blame is not all on him. I think he will get it, and be deadly when he does. But right now Kyrie-Al pick-and-rolls look way different that IT-Al did. I guess that's to be expected.

If Kyrie makes the shots he normally makes last night, we win by 10. Even without getting us into our sets well, he is a dangerous offensive threat that almost single-handedly took over that game and won it for us.

While Kyrie did have a couple defensive miscues (most notably the Dellavadova drive late the fourth), he has looked pretty good on defense. He is making plays defensively and staying active. It's only two games, but his 105 defensive rating is positive.

2. Smart looks really good to me. I like the way he is using his body. He is consistently beating his man on drives, something he hasn't done so far in his NBA career (and the reason why I started to doubt his upside). He also has had some elite offensive reads (Lebron-esque). For instance, one time last night, he ran a pick-and-roll on the right side of the court going into the middle, and threw an over-the-head, left-handed pass to the corner. The guy in the corner didn't shoot, but that pass isn't made a lot in the NBA. That puts a lot of pressure on defenses to rotate well.

It's a lot to ask of a 4th year player, but I was hoping Marcus' experience in CBS' system would help us as Kyrie got acclimated. That has not happened, but I appreciate how hard Marcus is playing and the growth to his game.

3. Brown looks really, really good too. Through 2 games, he has been our best player--did you ever think that would be the case? He is playing with so much poise and confidence right now. His shot looks improved. He is more under-control on his drives. And his defense has been elite. If he plays like that all year, he will make an All-Defense team (He will be inconsistent, and therefore won't, but when he is locked in, he is elite).

He was definitely outplayed by Lebron and Giannis, but he wasn't outmatched. That's huge for a 20 year old. Those two guys are arguably the best two forward in the NBA. Jaylen drew fouls on them, drew charges on them, played good positional defense, used his length to wreak havoc, and still scored on the other side of the ball. Again, he was outplayed, but not outmatched.

4. Tatum looks good too. His plus-minus stats aren't good, but I really like the things he is doing. He is using his length on defense and rebounds, which shows he wants to make an impact on the game. His offense is not there yet. He is too timid sometimes and other times too aggressive. We need him to be an offensive threat when he catches it.

5. Rozier looks good too. He is all over the court when he is out there. For a guy who wasn't that good of a shooter coming into the league, he is probably the second guy (after Kyrie) that I am most confident in when he shoots. He looks like he is in the mold of a Gary Harris, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, or Avery Bradley.

6. Ojeyle, Theis, and Nader are all NBA players. Once they get comfortable with the system and what they are asked to do, they can give us minutes. They are not Mickey-Young-Hunter type of bench players. Ojeyle and Nader would be starting for 10 teams in the league (i'm looking at you New Orleans). Theis could get minutes on most teams in the league too.

7. I don't like Baynes. He slows down our offense and fouls way to much. I like the toughness, but he really mucks things up on both sides of the court without much positive additions.

8. Horford is still doing his Horford things. I like his defense. He missed a lot of shots he normally makes last night. I think that is largely due to offensive rhythm and will improve as the season goes.

9. I hate the inconsistency on travel calls. The officials are obviously trying to crack down on the feet shuffle when players attack closeouts, but what's the point of that if Lebron and Giannis are allowed to jumpstop (landing both feet and different times) and then shuffle their feet and take another step? Those kinds of plays get old, because it seems like (green-tinted glasses?) we don't get away with those, but other teams do.

10. CBS is frustrated, which is understandable. On top of his boy Hayward suffering a scary injury, he had the toughest opening two nights of basketball in the NBA, coaching a team that had the most turnover in the NBA. He also has one of the youngest teams in the NBA. It must be hard to see his team struggle with the basics of his system this year, after he had his full system implemented last year.

I love CBS sets, but I have noticed that when players aren't comfortable in them yet and they get the ball, they tend to be timid. Sometimes, they just try seem to run the set, instead of running an offense. The basic rule of every offense is that you have to stay aggressive. This will get better the more comfortable they get, but it's hard to watch after the well-oiled offensive sets of last year.

11. Morris could be an important piece for us, especially this year. We need a little more veteran savyness and toughness, along with offensive aggression. I'm a little concerned that, because our offense is less than sharp right now, both Irving and Morris could default to iso-ball too much, which would get our young guys into bad habits, but he is a guy who can step into  some of Hayward's role and help us out.

12. For fans: CBS teaches patience. He encourages players to focus on getting better every day, and then he trusts the results to follow. Especially this year, we need to do the same. This year is going to be a key year in the development of a championship team. Every time Kyrie gets the timing right on a pick-and-roll and whips a pass to the corner is a success. Every time Tatum makes himself a threat when he catches the ball and makes a quick offensive read is a success. Every time Jaylen locks in on defense is a success. Every time Rozier snakes around a screen for a pullup 15-footer is a success. Every time Smart remembers that he is the strongest guard in the league and bullies his way into the paint on a drive/postup is a success. Etc. Etc.

Enjoy the small things. This fire is going to purify this team, and we will be better because of it.

It could be worse--we could be Knicks fans.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2017, 11:15:44 AM by DefenseWinsChamps »

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #1 on: October 19, 2017, 11:22:22 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
With Kyrie I get the sense that his instinct as a star is to try to hoist haymakers that, if successful, will break the opponent's morale.

That's awesome when it works.  It also made more sense when he was playing second fiddle to a guy who does so many things big and small on the court to make the game easy for his teammates.

At this point, I'm just not sure that Kyrie has figured out how him being really talented can make life easier for his teammates.  The main storyline of this season for me is whether Kyrie, with Brad's help, can figure that out.  Or at least start to figure it out.
You値l have to excuse my lengthiness葉he reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2017, 11:31:07 AM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6043
  • Tommy Points: 766
With Kyrie I get the sense that his instinct as a star is to try to hoist haymakers that, if successful, will break the opponent's morale.

That's awesome when it works.  It also made more sense when he was playing second fiddle to a guy who does so many things big and small on the court to make the game easy for his teammates.

At this point, I'm just not sure that Kyrie has figured out how him being really talented can make life easier for his teammates.  The main storyline of this season for me is whether Kyrie, with Brad's help, can figure that out.  Or at least start to figure it out.

I agree. I'm not saying I'm not concerned about Kyrie, but if I was a betting man, I would say the coach who taught Jordan Crawford, Isaiah Thomas, and Evan Turner to run an effective offense without playing hero ball can teach Kyrie Irving.

Just imagine the combination of haymaker shots with offensive system jabs.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2017, 11:37:13 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
With Kyrie I get the sense that his instinct as a star is to try to hoist haymakers that, if successful, will break the opponent's morale.

That's awesome when it works.  It also made more sense when he was playing second fiddle to a guy who does so many things big and small on the court to make the game easy for his teammates.

At this point, I'm just not sure that Kyrie has figured out how him being really talented can make life easier for his teammates.  The main storyline of this season for me is whether Kyrie, with Brad's help, can figure that out.  Or at least start to figure it out.

I agree. I'm not saying I'm not concerned about Kyrie, but if I was a betting man, I would say the coach who taught Jordan Crawford, Isaiah Thomas, and Evan Turner to run an effective offense without playing hero ball can teach Kyrie Irving.

Just imagine the combination of haymaker shots with offensive system jabs.

Very fair point.
You値l have to excuse my lengthiness葉he reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #4 on: October 19, 2017, 11:49:54 AM »

Offline Big333223

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7489
  • Tommy Points: 741
TP to the OP

Very nice.
1957, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1968, 1969, 1974, 1976, 1981, 1984, 1986, 2008

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #5 on: October 19, 2017, 11:58:09 AM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
Going to be an interesting season. Smart will play himself off the team, as Rozier III will be on his rookie deal longer and is showing he can handle 3rd guard duties, and Brown looks more like he will be taking up a lot of cap space when his time comes. Smart seems the odd guy out, but will be an impact player for us at least until the trade deadline.

Danny didn't build this roster to contend this year, as evidenced by youth rather than veterans on 3rd string. We're going to see young players get lots and lots of run.  I wouldn't put us ahead of Washington this year, and Toronto and the Bucks are with us battling for the top half of the playoff bracket. I could easily see us finishing anywhere 3-6, with a tough path through the playoffs.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #6 on: October 19, 2017, 12:39:32 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 43394
  • Tommy Points: 3150
I thought Jaylen would be awesome from the get go. He works so hard and has such a high motor and physical tools. Last night the REFS wouldn't let him play and he was still fantastic. He's going to be at least a Jimmy Butler level player.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #7 on: October 19, 2017, 12:40:46 PM »

Offline Rosco917

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6108
  • Tommy Points: 559
I'll second the TP

We've missed this type of cohesive thought. 

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #8 on: October 19, 2017, 12:59:15 PM »

Offline seancally

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1097
  • Tommy Points: 119
All valid, well-considered points.

I'm inclined to disagree re: Baynes. While I see your point, I also think it's essential to have someone with girth, toughness, physicality and some skill on the floor from time to time. I've always though Bogut was an underrated piece on the Warriors team that lost to the Cavs - after he went down, suddenly Lebron looks in the paint and sees nothing but daylight. Bogut is (was) a better player than Baynes but they're in the same mold. If he can keep hitting that little pick-and-pop, block a few shots, be an intimidator in the paint and give some hard fouls, I'll be happy with that. Because the alternative in the post is..... uhhh......  ???
"The game honors toughness." - President Stevens

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #9 on: October 19, 2017, 01:02:07 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6043
  • Tommy Points: 766
Going to be an interesting season. Smart will play himself off the team, as Rozier III will be on his rookie deal longer and is showing he can handle 3rd guard duties, and Brown looks more like he will be taking up a lot of cap space when his time comes. Smart seems the odd guy out, but will be an impact player for us at least until the trade deadline.

Danny didn't build this roster to contend this year, as evidenced by youth rather than veterans on 3rd string. We're going to see young players get lots and lots of run.  I wouldn't put us ahead of Washington this year, and Toronto and the Bucks are with us battling for the top half of the playoff bracket. I could easily see us finishing anywhere 3-6, with a tough path through the playoffs.

Well, a new contract for Brown would kick in when Horford's is off the books. So I'm not worried about that.

You may be right about the Rozier/Smart thing. It's the same reason why DA has drafted guys like Bird and Allen, who are long shots to make the NBA. If they do develop, they can be signed for cheap 3-4 year contracts that give you 80% of the production of those other 3D guards.

We'll see what happens, but I'm not too worried about it. It's just fun to have so much depth right now.

If you really think about it, I wonder if there is a coaching statistic for how much money a coach helps players to earn for their career. CBS has helped KO, Turner, Bradley, Crowder, Thomas, etc. make a lot of money so far, not to mention how he developed guys like Hayward and Mack in college. Moving forward, Smart, Brown, Tatum, and Rozier look like locks to get a lot of money. Ojeyle, Yabusele, and Nader could get paid too. If you are a young talented player, you'd want to play for CBS.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2017, 01:04:33 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6043
  • Tommy Points: 766
All valid, well-considered points.

I'm inclined to disagree re: Baynes. While I see your point, I also think it's essential to have someone with girth, toughness, physicality and some skill on the floor from time to time. I've always though Bogut was an underrated piece on the Warriors team that lost to the Cavs - after he went down, suddenly Lebron looks in the paint and sees nothing but daylight. Bogut is (was) a better player than Baynes but they're in the same mold. If he can keep hitting that little pick-and-pop, block a few shots, be an intimidator in the paint and give some hard fouls, I'll be happy with that. Because the alternative in the post is..... uhhh......  ???

TP. Good thoughts. He probably does have value.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2017, 01:54:56 PM »

Offline No Nickname

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 772
  • Tommy Points: 81
Nader already looks better than James Young ever did. 

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2017, 02:02:58 PM »

Offline Monkhouse

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6932
  • Tommy Points: 814
  • A true Celtic plays with heart.
Nader already looks better than James Young ever did.

Which is funny to  me, because I absolutely loathe Nader's game...

I would take back Young over Nader any day. I can't stand watching Nader take another dumb ill advised shot..... Love Smart, but we already have one shot chucking inefficient player.
"I bomb atomically, Socrates' philosophies and hypotheses
Can't define how I be dropping these mockeries."

Is the glass half-full or half-empty?
It's based on your perspective, quite simply
We're the same and we're not; know what I'm saying? Listen
Son, I ain't better than you, I just think different

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2017, 02:15:19 PM »

Offline DefenseWinsChamps

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6043
  • Tommy Points: 766
Nader already looks better than James Young ever did.

Which is funny to  me, because I absolutely loathe Nader's game...

I would take back Young over Nader any day. I can't stand watching Nader take another dumb ill advised shot..... Love Smart, but we already have one shot chucking inefficient player.

I get your point. I don't think all of Nader's shots are dumb and ill-advised, but he does have some.

What Nader brings to the game is aggressiveness, which is especially lacking as players get comfortable with each other and the offensive system. I think CBS likes that Nader makes decisions quickly and aggressively, even if they are sometimes not the best decision, because it speeds up the offense and makes everyone more aggressive. In some ways, Smart does the same thing.

Nader does have some moves. He can get to the basket and draw some fouls. He is also a decent spot-up shooter. But he is a below average passer and defender.

Young was terrible on defense and was a terrible passer. He was timid and could not drive. His potential as a shooter was the only redeeming quality about his game, but Nader at least matches what Young showed.

I think the marking quality of Young is how he left absolutely no impression on the game, other than general inneffectiveness. On the other hand, Nader changes the game dynamics. He leaves an impression, and CBS can use him when it is a positive impression and sit him when its not. In that sense, he is an ideal bench player that can be used in stints during the game.

Re: My Thoughts on the Celtics First Two Games
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2017, 02:15:24 PM »

Offline JBcat

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3642
  • Tommy Points: 512
I値l keep it simple.  We really need Morris to be that reliable 15 PPG player with solid D.  I知 excited for the young players especially Brown and Tatum but it will lessen the burden on them if Morris is that player.  Morris had some huge games last season including 2 games with almost 40 points.  Maybe he has even more in him for us.

If he does that we can live with the inconsistancies that comes with young players.  Also I think there are still some decent FAs out there for our 15th spot.  I know Green has already been mentioned, but there others as well like Monta Ellis.