Author Topic: Julius Randle  (Read 2172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Julius Randle
« on: July 01, 2019, 10:34:14 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
21.4 ppg, 8.7 Rebs, 3.1 Ast.   21.02 PER

Signed for 3 years 63 million with the Knicks...

Thats A LOT of production on a cheap contract...

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2019, 10:34:42 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
Perfect empty stats guys for an empty roster of a team that has no plan.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2019, 10:41:09 AM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13051
  • Tommy Points: 1763
  • Everybody knows what's best for you
Randle seems like a guy who was once so overrated that he is now underrated. That is a decent deal for him and the Knicks. If he continues to produce, that contract will absolutely be movable. If he can ever improve his defense, he will be a force in the middle (a lot to ask).

People are laughing at the Knicks on this one, but it seemed like a good gamble once all of the top FAs dried up. It's not like he's a re-tread like so many former Knicks' big FA signings.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2019, 10:44:32 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
Perfect empty stats guys for an empty roster of a team that has no plan.

Actually, he's an extremely efficient scorer.  His true shooting percentage last year was 60%, and his eFG% was .55

He attempted 6.7 FT a game (more than any Celtic), has improved every year of his career and he's only 24 years old...

No clue why the Celtics would not be in the mix for him given he was available at such a discount.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2019, 10:44:51 AM »

Offline RodyTur10

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2762
  • Tommy Points: 292
  • Always offline from 9pm till 3am
21.4 ppg, 8.7 Rebs, 3.1 Ast.   21.02 PER

Signed for 3 years 63 million with the Knicks...

Thats A LOT of production on a cheap contract...

Wish the Celtics had signed him. Good deal for the Knicks.
Not so sure about Portis and Bullock.

Seems like signing Randle/Bryant was possible for the Celtics.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2019, 10:47:35 AM »

Offline TheSundanceKid

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2493
  • Tommy Points: 199
I'm not sure he'd put up those numbers on a good team, and I don't rate his defence.

Perfect guy for the Knicks though..

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2019, 10:47:44 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
Perfect empty stats guys for an empty roster of a team that has no plan.

Actually, he's an extremely efficient scorer.  His true shooting percentage last year was 60%, and his eFG% was .55

He attempted 6.7 FT a game (more than any Celtic), has improved every year of his career and he's only 24 years old...

No clue why the Celtics would not be in the mix for him given he was available at such a discount.
I'm aware of his counting stats, they are largely empty. He doesn't help his team win games. He hurt the NOP when he was on the court.

Besides the C's could only go after one big dollar FA with their cap space. I'm much happier with Kemba.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2019, 10:52:37 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
Oh man I don't like the fit of Portis and Randle on the same team at all.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2019, 10:53:06 AM »

Offline BringToughnessBack

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8088
  • Tommy Points: 941
So, in the end, Randle got a more valuable contract then Smart. I remember the days of us comparing the two over and over. I think Smart has more of an impact on a playoff team but money never lies..does it?  :'( I guess it helps to have the Knicks as desperate as it gets as well as they prepare for Giannis in 2021(dont see that happening either. He seems like someone who would not be drawn to NYC but who knows).

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2019, 10:54:59 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30859
  • Tommy Points: 1327
So, in the end, Randle got a more valuable contract then Smart. I remember the days of us comparing the two over and over. I think Smart has more of an impact on a playoff team but money never lies..does it?  :'( I guess it helps to have the Knicks as desperate as it gets as well as they prepare for Giannis in 2021(dont see that happening either. He seems like someone who would not be drawn to NYC but who knows).
Scoring gets you paid in the NBA. Not winning and certainly not first team all-defense. That's always been the case.

I wouldn't consider the Knicks spending to the salary floor a great measure of value for players though. Also after what Rozier got, I think Marcus could have gotten a lot more money this year as an unrestricted free agent.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2019, 11:03:51 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
You make it out as if $20m+ a season is some small amount. The AAV of Randle's contract isn't much less than All-Star Vucevic, who is a better defender, shooter and rebounder. Also, the C's weren't in the running because they were busy signing an All-NBA guard
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2019, 11:06:35 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
You make it out as if $20m+ a season is some small amount. The AAV of Randle's contract isn't much less than All-Star Vucevic, who is a better defender, shooter and rebounder. Also, the C's weren't in the running because they were busy signing an All-NBA guard

My point is just that it's a great contract.  For example, it's about 65% of what Gordon Hayward got paid for the same production in his contract year.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2019, 11:08:00 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3141
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
You make it out as if $20m+ a season is some small amount. The AAV of Randle's contract isn't much less than All-Star Vucevic, who is a better defender, shooter and rebounder. Also, the C's weren't in the running because they were busy signing an All-NBA guard

My point is just that it's a great contract.  For example, it's about 60% of what Gordon Hayward got paid for the same production in his contract year.
It was really just a matter of time before you made this some boring attack on Hayward. It's not that great a contract, considering he plays no offence
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #13 on: July 01, 2019, 11:11:32 AM »

Offline footey

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15974
  • Tommy Points: 1834
Comparing what guys get paid in different contract years to determine relative market value is pretty meaningless. A lot more cash was around this year vs last year.

Re: Julius Randle
« Reply #14 on: July 01, 2019, 11:13:12 AM »

Offline IDreamCeltics

  • NCE
  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1401
  • Tommy Points: 140
Comparing what guys get paid in different contract years to determine relative market value is pretty meaningless. A lot more cash was around this year vs last year.

I disagree, I think the Patriots have proven salary management is the most important aspect of constructing a winning franchise and culture.