Game 2 was just a dumb plan in daring Miami to shoot wide open 3s. I am glad to see that plan has been shelved for the last two games.
It seems like Joe does learn from his mistakes, even if he sometimes acts like nothing was wrong to the media.
But he's slow in doing it. When something obviously isn't working, it shouldn't take a game to adjust.
So after two beat downs in a row, we are still talking about Game2?
Because it's a discussion about Joe's coaching?
Why do you even bother posting in this thread? You don't seem to have much interest in adding anything to the conversation. Instead, you just tell other people what they should and shouldn't be talking about.
I post in this thread to give my opinion, like everyone else. There's no authority on this subject. We all watch and formulate our own opinions. I have watched each of the four games. In total, Joe has been good.
I was making the point that it doesn't seem fair to continue to go back to Game 2 to draw conclusions. Judging people by their mistakes/shortcomings and ignoring their accomplishments is a tough look.
We're discussing how long it takes Joe to adjust, and you think looking back two games ago is unfair?
In isolation, it is fair.
There's context for this thread, however. Critics have frequently looked back at another season with a different team. Most of the players are the same, but its still a different squad. Joe was in Year 1 and now he's in Year 2. I expect that he will improve going forward. I imagine Jordan Walsh will continue to improve as well.
If people are pointing out Joe's accomplishments, it seems needlessly negative to throw out "what about last year, or what about game 2". SNL has an entire skit called Debbie Downer based on this.