Some scientists think this show is not too scientific.
http://www.wired.com/2013/04/a-quick-check-on-espns-sport-science/This guy picks apart their science in several cases above. There is a reason ESPN is not putting men on the moon or the like, they are about sports and science is not their forte. But projections of potential certainly is, and we all know how that works. Sometimes it does and you look great other times you look like a fool because it doesn't happen.
Nice measurements that have not translated into solid playing time or dominance, that ought to scare his supporters but it does not because to like him, one has to ignore stats. Science is based is facts and theories that are based in fact. Dragan simply has not shown more than he is a hypothesis at this point. If he was as great as some say, why didn't he play more? Some real tall guys have played and not done well.
This is ESPN hype, little more they did they same thing for Exum. How did that work out?