Author Topic: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11  (Read 38786 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #210 on: February 11, 2009, 11:25:40 PM »

Offline ACF

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10756
  • Tommy Points: 1157
  • A Celtic Fan
I know I'm a bit late but TP for FL  :)

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #211 on: February 11, 2009, 11:59:45 PM »

Offline Truck Lewis

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1940
  • Tommy Points: 1053
  • Reggie "Truck" Lewis
i dont know if this has been mentioned,,,but i found it interesting on espn's recap

"With the win, the Celtics improved to 43-11 and are now one win ahead of last season's mark through 54 games."
Looking for a Sig designer....obviously i will be greatful with tps.

Looking for a Wire - Rondo theme....PM with ideas and I'll tp

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #212 on: February 12, 2009, 12:11:20 AM »

Offline Brickowski

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Tommy Points: 423
Horrible officiating in the first half.  It's the only reason the game was close.

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #213 on: February 12, 2009, 12:51:05 AM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
why cant leon and baby play well together  >:( it seems when one is on a streak the other is in a slump

baby:okay, ive been playing well lately and im going to hibernate again. your turn playing well while il stink for a while
leon:got it

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #214 on: February 12, 2009, 10:55:15 AM »

Offline expobear

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 287
  • Tommy Points: 27
why cant leon and baby play well together  >:( it seems when one is on a streak the other is in a slump

baby:okay, ive been playing well lately and im going to hibernate again. your turn playing well while il stink for a while
leon:got it


It's much harder for a bench player averaging 15-20 minutes a game to play well throughout an 82 game season than it is for a starter.  If a bench player misses his first few shots, he's quickly pulled whereas a starter will get 35 minutes to eventually warm up and shoot his way out of his funk. Of course, starters are starters for a reason.....because they're better players and deserve to play more.  But from a perspective of a bench guy, sometimes it's tough to play consistently well for long stretches. 

Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #215 on: February 12, 2009, 11:00:05 AM »

Offline CelticsWhat35

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2911
  • Tommy Points: 353
I don't know if it was mentioned earlier, but I was upset with Perk when he argued a foul call that ended up going to KG.  It was definitely a foul on Perk, and he seemed relieved when the ref said it was on KG.  And KG ended up being in foul trouble later on.  There's an unwritten rule.  If there's a foul called and you're next to an all-star player on your team, you raise your hand.


Re: Celtics (42-11) at Hornets (30-18) 2/11
« Reply #216 on: February 12, 2009, 11:15:46 AM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
i dont know if this has been mentioned,,,but i found it interesting on espn's recap

"With the win, the Celtics improved to 43-11 and are now one win ahead of last season's mark through 54 games."


How is that possible? Didn't last year's team have James Posey?   ;)