Does Ainge get a lot of bashing around here? I think at the time of the deal, some people were upset mostly because they felt Pierce and Garnett deserved a say in whether they wanted to finish in green. I don't think anybody thought the return wasn't great, because it was. At that point Pierce and Garnett were past their primes, even a homer could see that. To get that many first rounders for them was a steal.
Now, we don't know what happened behind the scenes. It could have been that they told Pierce and Garnett the team would probably have to rebuild and the response was they were not interested in that, only they didn't want to declare it publicly. In that case, the team could have said fine, we'll take the PR hit for you guys.
I certainly have criticized Ainge in the past for draft choices (specifically missing Giannis) but I never thought he was a bad GM, nor did I expect him to be perfect. It should be OK to complain without it being considered "bashing."
Also, it seems strange to applaud Ainge for the ping pong balls falling right. Our best odds were to finish fourth. Would you still be making this post if that had happened?