First an aside....please lay off Garnett and Rondo. Garnett is carrying us and Rondo remains vital whether he scores or not....
I believe that Doc, in his mind, is allowing home victories to dictate his rotations on the road. We win at home, sometimes easily, so why can't the same guys win on the road? I have a problem with thisline of reasoning if it is in fact representative. I said during the Atlanta series that they may not need Eddie or Tony at home, but they sure needed him/them on the road.....
He deserves credit for going to Eddie House last night. Did you see the ball moving again? But, and this is what I was thinking during the game, why leave Rondo, who can ignite at any moment and commits the fewest turnovers of all our guards (at least per amount of time he has the ball), out of the game for so long?? Why not leave House in the game when Rondo comes back in and give Ray Allen a breather for heaven's sake? And you know, Doc was right, Cassell is a bit like Vinnie the microwave, so when Rondo needed a breather in the second half, why not bring in Cassell for Rondo and House for Ray Allen, just to see if Cassell was going to be on?
It was clear House was in a groove, both shooting wise and how he handled the ball, so give Ray Allen a breather, let House play but by all means don't banish Rondo (he's earned the right to play through rough stretches), and see what Cassell's got. This is not hindsight...these were my thoughts during the game....
I love Ray Allen and I'm not advocating he be benched.....But what's with the riding a cold player into the ground when you've got potential assets on the bench??