Author Topic: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16  (Read 30980 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #135 on: January 16, 2016, 09:03:31 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
Finally, a Crowder dunk.

i know people love dunks but it's just a waste of effort most times, especially for guards/forwards who play both ends. Just lay it up if you can.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #136 on: January 16, 2016, 09:03:50 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18722
  • Tommy Points: 1819
So we have a ton of draft picks but our philosophy is not to play rookies.

I actually think they're all playing for Maine tonight.
didnt CBS play smart a lot last year? and hunter has gotten at least a little time. i dont thnk CBS is genetically wired to avoid playing rookies. i think he just plays those players he believes will help the team win. often that list does not include rookies.

Yes, smart did. Top 7s usually do.

I just think all these picks are a waste if they don't play.

Some nights I'm not even sure if this team will make the playoffs, so playing only veterans doesn't make much sense.




Regardless of where they come from, a team can only have a 15 deep roster, 13 players dressing, and 5 players on the floor at all times.

Stop overthinking it.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #137 on: January 16, 2016, 09:04:14 PM »

Offline arctic 3.0

  • NCE
  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2554
  • Tommy Points: 406
Iseah to Jae!
Reminded me of the rr to ta vs lebron.
Not nearly as beutiful but just as effective.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #138 on: January 16, 2016, 09:06:04 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18722
  • Tommy Points: 1819
Finally, a Crowder dunk.

i know people love dunks but it's just a waste of effort most times, especially for guards/forwards who play both ends. Just lay it up if you can.

This has nothing to do with that. A pure simple dunk is the highest percent shot in the game. Crowder has wasted a lot of opportunities since he came because he refuses to do so.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #139 on: January 16, 2016, 09:06:49 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48501
  • Tommy Points: 2951
This lineup is always going to have rebounding issues. Sully is a plus rebounder, Amir and Crowder are pretty average rebounders for their position, and Bradley and IT are both less than average rebounders. Hard to be a good rebounding unit when you add that to an undersized lineup.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #140 on: January 16, 2016, 09:06:53 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21217
  • Tommy Points: 2450
So we have a ton of draft picks but our philosophy is not to play rookies.

I actually think they're all playing for Maine tonight.
didnt CBS play smart a lot last year? and hunter has gotten at least a little time. i dont thnk CBS is genetically wired to avoid playing rookies. i think he just plays those players he believes will help the team win. often that list does not include rookies.

Yes, smart did. Top 7s usually do.

I just think all these picks are a waste if they don't play.

Some nights I'm not even sure if this team will make the playoffs, so playing only veterans doesn't make much sense.




Regardless of where they come from, a team can only have a 15 deep roster, 13 players dressing, and 5 players on the floor at all times.

Stop overthinking it.

Sure, I will just swallow the blue pill.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #141 on: January 16, 2016, 09:08:51 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24993
  • Tommy Points: 2715
Oubre looks quite good. Better imo than Winslow who Ainge was after so hard.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #142 on: January 16, 2016, 09:09:26 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48501
  • Tommy Points: 2951
We're making Gortat look like Cousins down there.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #143 on: January 16, 2016, 09:09:45 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48501
  • Tommy Points: 2951
Bradley should NEVER attempt to throw an alley-oop..

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #144 on: January 16, 2016, 09:09:49 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18722
  • Tommy Points: 1819
So we have a ton of draft picks but our philosophy is not to play rookies.

I actually think they're all playing for Maine tonight.
didnt CBS play smart a lot last year? and hunter has gotten at least a little time. i dont thnk CBS is genetically wired to avoid playing rookies. i think he just plays those players he believes will help the team win. often that list does not include rookies.

Yes, smart did. Top 7s usually do.

I just think all these picks are a waste if they don't play.

Some nights I'm not even sure if this team will make the playoffs, so playing only veterans doesn't make much sense.




Regardless of where they come from, a team can only have a 15 deep roster, 13 players dressing, and 5 players on the floor at all times.

Stop overthinking it.

Sure, I will just swallow the blue pill.

The point is, we can argue of who we want to get the playing time, but having this amount of youth is not a problem.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #145 on: January 16, 2016, 09:10:51 PM »

Offline jpotter33

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48501
  • Tommy Points: 2951
How come it's never a foul when their defenders are rough with ours out on the perimeter?

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #146 on: January 16, 2016, 09:11:39 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21217
  • Tommy Points: 2450
Need KO, to have a big second half.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #147 on: January 16, 2016, 09:12:14 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18722
  • Tommy Points: 1819
What a weak call.

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #148 on: January 16, 2016, 09:14:45 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
time to pull ab, he cant shoot to save a life.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)

Re: Celtics (21-19) at Wizards (19-19) Game #41 1/16/16
« Reply #149 on: January 16, 2016, 09:15:25 PM »

Offline ImShakHeIsShaq

  • NCE
  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7739
  • Tommy Points: 804
haha i called it.
It takes me 3hrs to get to Miami and 1hr to get to Orlando... but I *SPIT* on their NBA teams! "Bless God and bless the (Celts)"-Lady GaGa (she said gays but she really meant Celts)